wg-gen-web VS wg-access-server

For client devices (like phones, laptops, workstations) i use wg-gen-web

If he goes funky there's always this: https://github.com/vx3r/wg-gen-web

I ended up working with wg-gen-web (https://github.com/vx3r/wg-gen-web). It’s pretty slick looking, easy to use, and after some struggles I managed to get authentication working. I also tweaked the docker image to change a few things to my liking (page title, etc). I still feel like this is the missing piece in WireGuard. I know it’s still new, but with this GUI, I have a pretty damn good solution for the few users I have that need it.

You would have to do some more Setup around it but wg-gen-web can do this

Not sure about running wireguard itself in a container but i've been running this GUI and the github page also provide some systemd hooks so that when the config changes, wireguard is restarted on the host.

There are scripts that generate the configs for you but also web services you can host yourself which also have a nice ui.

Your VPN (Wiregiard) is independent of that - it will allow you to access the Rpi itself from outside (as if you were in your LAN). I recommend https://github.com/vx3r/wg-gen-web to manage your WG configuration.

I tried them all. I settled on wg-access-server.

Yes, at my startup we run https://github.com/Place1/wg-access-server inside our kubernetes clusters to give engineers access to local pods vs the k8s DNS (.svc.cluster.local). It works relatively well but we've had to make a couple modifications:

1. I had to deploy CoreDNS to our cluster and set up DNS query rewriting to redirect queries from .cluster.mystartup to *.svc.cluster.local because docker on OS X has issues resolving hostnames that end in .local

What is the difference from https://github.com/Place1/wg-access-server ?

Not sure why this is downvoted. I use a similar service that runs in docker just fine. https://github.com/Place1/wg-access-server