watchexec VS nx

Hi, I am using Watchexec (https://github.com/watchexec/watchexec/releases) to monitor folder changes, but I want to exclude some folders. What parameter should I use to perform the route exclusions?

Use https://github.com/watchexec/watchexec

There's something similar to this called watchexec, which you can have a look at https://github.com/watchexec/watchexec

Or use watchexec which will do 95% of what you need and you're not tied to nodejs.

watchexec

I use watchexec to automatically run the code when saved, you should customise this to your liking.

OTOH PowerShell will not keep watching and is one of the requirements. In the past I've successfully used watchexecrepo and inotifywaitrepo.

For this exercice, we will create a Nx workspace, which helps scaffolding all your Angular setup. geonetwork-ui itself is a monorepo powered by Nx.

Nx Documentation: Monorepos Made Easy

Take Nx as an example. Head over to their Issues tab, pick a bug, and try to reproduce it. Then read through the code, understand the business logic, and make a fix. If you manage to create a successful pull request, congratulations—you just did the same thing professional developers do daily.

Nx Documentation: https://nx.dev/ - Official documentation for the Nx build system.

🏗️ The Umi's plugin system and API is quite interesting. You can do a lot with that. The approach is quite common for dev tools and in this case resembles both Vite and Nx with their extensibility and community orientation. There's a huge ecosystem of plugins of all sorts, and you can always complement them with your own (which is quite important for sophisticated enterprise development). I'd assume you could build pretty decent metaframework mechanisms with this flexible approach. At least, as I mentioned already, you have a bunch of thoughtful building blocks for that.

Nx is our choice for managing the project's monorepo structure. It provides powerful tools for scaling our development process, ensuring code reusability, and maintaining consistency across different parts of the application. With Nx, we can efficiently manage multiple projects within the EczEase ecosystem, from the main web application to potential mobile apps and backend services.

Hello! I used to like NX a lot. It was a monorepo for all my projects—different brands and clients in one place. It worked well, but it didn’t suit me. Most of my projects are single Angular apps. So, I stopped using one big NX repo and made separate projects instead. Here’s why I prefer it.

The project is using Nx workspace + PNPM for package management

Then there’s the tooling. Micro-frontends aren’t as plug-and-play as a monolith yet. You’ll likely need custom build pipelines, deployment scripts, and a solid CI/CD setup. Tools like Nx can help here—its monorepo approach is a lifesaver for managing multiple micro-frontends in one cohesive workspace. Their micro-frontend guide is worth a peek if you’re curious.