photo-stream VS Photo Stream

First thing I thought of are applications like Photostream. But I thought maybe someone knows of an even better application for my usecase, or has their own experienced to share. (Photostream doesnt support videos though for example).

Currently using photo stream

While photo-stream does not officially support subfolders it could probably achieved with some manual work or a custom script. There has been a short discussion about it here.

Not 100% sure but I think PhotoStream can do what you want. You could mount the shared folder and ever time a new photo will be dropped it should update the static page which also allows downloading a photo if you set the config for that. Depending on your setup you might have to automate syncing if you need that.

If you just want to showcase your photos on a static page have a look at Photo Stream.

For something simple you could check out photo-stream. I think it's good for an online portfolio of your work.

I run Plex, 3 instances of photo-stream, a couple HomeKit related automations, librespeed, an api for my lametric clock, and a few really simple web pages like a darts scoreboard and a weather page.

Photo Stream - Minimalist self-hosted photo stream. (Demo)

Docker c’est un système pour faire des containers (une sorte de virtualisation mais plus simple qu’une vm) et le Dockerfile ce sont les instructions pour construire ce container (ici on part d’un container avec ruby installé, on télécharge vips, on le compile, on copie le contenu du dossier d’où tu le lance dans le containers, on va dans ce dossier, on installe bunder, jekyll et les dépendances de photo-stream, on expose le port 4000 pour jekyll et on lance jekyll). Même sans utiliser docker un Dockerfile peut être une bonne indication des commandes à faire pour installer un truc.