Photo Stream VS Piwigo

I run Plex, 3 instances of photo-stream, a couple HomeKit related automations, librespeed, an api for my lametric clock, and a few really simple web pages like a darts scoreboard and a weather page.

Photo Stream - Minimalist self-hosted photo stream. (Demo)

Docker c’est un système pour faire des containers (une sorte de virtualisation mais plus simple qu’une vm) et le Dockerfile ce sont les instructions pour construire ce container (ici on part d’un container avec ruby installé, on télécharge vips, on le compile, on copie le contenu du dossier d’où tu le lance dans le containers, on va dans ce dossier, on installe bunder, jekyll et les dépendances de photo-stream, on expose le port 4000 pour jekyll et on lance jekyll). Même sans utiliser docker un Dockerfile peut être une bonne indication des commandes à faire pour installer un truc.

This is not for everyone, but I host my family photos myself, most recently with this: https://piwigo.org/. I have been doing this since 2007 (started on a different software, called "gallery". Was able to migrate from gallery2 to gallery3 and now piwigo), and so far no major issues. Advantage: I can easily share photos with family, no need for iCloud, Facebook, or indeed any service- they just need a web browser on their desktop computer or phone.

There is also Piwigo which is open-source and can be self hosted.

https://piwigo.org/

piwigo.org

Piwigo FREE Photo Storage= https://piwigo.org/

A couple additiona maybe?: - Piwigo great for photo management. Could be used as an alternative to Google Photos - Nexcloud for file sharing. Replacement for Google Drive.

I use https://piwigo.org/ on a old PC that I installed Linux on.

I have on my list to evaluate self-hosted image clouds Piwigo and Photoprism but they don't bridge the photogrammetry gap either. It might even be more time consuming if I have to download the assets I'm working on first.