wappalyzer VS Cppcheck

Ooh and there is a cool Chrome extension called Wappalyzer. It detects which technologies, programming languages, frameworks and plugins are used of a certain website you are currently in.

If you ever run into his issue again and dont know how to view source code, https://www.wappalyzer.com/ is a nice plugin that can outline the tech stack for a website.

https://www.wappalyzer.com/ might be what you’re looking for

Next time, use this: https://www.wappalyzer.com/. It shows the tech stack of whatever website you put for the URL. For both of those sites, I didn't see any animation libraries detected. My guess would be pure JS or GSAP.

The easiest way is via tools like Wappalyzer that test the tech stack of a website and can detect which anti-bot is used on it.

Wappalyzer Chrome extension is my go to

There's a browser extension for that: https://www.wappalyzer.com/

I dedicated Sunday morning to going over the documentation of the linters we use in the project. The goal was to understand all options and use them in the best way for our project. Seeing their manuals side by side was nice because even very similar things are solved differently. Cppcheck is the most configurable and best documented; JSON Lint lies at the other end.

Using infer, someone else exploited null-dereference checks to introduce simple affine types in C++. Cppcheck also checks for null-dereferences. Unfortunately, that approach means that borrow-counting references have a larger sizeof than non-borrow counting references, so optimizing the count away potentially changes the semantics of a program which introduces a whole new way of writing subtly wrong code.

Also check out (cppcheck)[https://github.com/danmar/cppcheck] if you want more static analysis

My browser refuses to open that link. This is better: https://github.com/danmar/cppcheck

cppcheck - Extensible C/C++ static analyzer focused on finding bugs.

and five C/C++ static code analyzers: * clang-tidy * oclint * cppcheck * cpplint (recently added!) * include-what-you-use (recently added!)

Start by feeding your codebase to a static analysis tool like cppcheck, to rule out obvious bound-checking mistakes in it.

Cppcheck is free. I've previously used it with a C++ project.