voila
livebook
voila | livebook | |
---|---|---|
23 | 80 | |
5,214 | 4,425 | |
1.0% | 2.1% | |
7.9 | 9.8 | |
18 days ago | 4 days ago | |
Python | Elixir | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
voila
-
voila VS solara - a user suggested alternative
2 projects | 13 Oct 2023
-
Show HN: Mercury – convert Jupyter Notebooks to Web Apps without code rewriting
Quick link: https://github.com/voila-dashboards/voila
Humbly recommend when you share a product, you include a link to it ;)
https://voila.readthedocs.io/en/stable/
-
Evidence – Business Intelligence as Code
> Works with CI/CD out of the box. Deploy to vercel, netlify, your own infra.
Jupyter is suited for whatever you want to do with it. Voila exists to enable the use case of re-generating notebooks on a CI/CD system: https://github.com/voila-dashboards/voila
Anyways, seems like the templating is more powerful than the one being offered by Jupyter Notebooks.
Good luck and much success with it :)
- Ask HN: Fastest way to turn a Jupyter notebook into a website these days?
-
Warning, Streamlit collects a lot of data!
i don't understand why everyone isn't just using voila. it's so much better than streamlit or gradio. but that's just my opinion i guess.
-
Mercury – Turn Python Notebooks to Web Apps
Ill have to check it out and see how it compares to voilà and holoviz panel. What I like about Holoviz panel is you can create a data web app from code that resides in a notebook or create a completely standalone app from just plain py scripts, and it supports many different visualization backends. I have found it to be the more flexible and generalizable data web app framework among the others I have come across (like Voilà, Dash, Plotly, and Streamlit).
-
Turn Jupyter Notebook to Web App with open-source Mercury framework and Python only
Any insights what the differences between this and Voila are? https://github.com/voila-dashboards/voila
-
New library to develop streamlit apps in jupyter
A nifty little alternative to voila, one might say.
-
How do you guys share R/Python based analyses to business stakeholders?
Markdown and/or Voilà https://github.com/voila-dashboards/voila
-
Looking for web app generator from JSON data
If you are comfortable working in a Jupyter Notebook you can combine ipywidgets & Voila.
livebook
-
Super simple validated structs in Elixir
To get started you need a running instance of Livebook
- Arraymancer – Deep Learning Nim Library
-
Setup Nx lib and EXLA to run NX/AXON with CUDA
LiveBook site
-
Interactive Code Cells
I prefer functional programming with Livebook[1] for this type of thing. Once you run a cell, it can be published right into a web component as well.
[1] - https://livebook.dev
-
What software should I use as an alternative to Microsoft OneNote?
If you're a coder, Livebook might be worth a look too. I certainly have my eyes on it.
-
Advent of Code Day 5
Would highly recommend looking at Jose's use of livebook to answer these. It makes testing easier. It's old but still relevant. Video link inside
- Advent of Code 2023 is nigh
-
Racket branch of Chez Scheme merging with mainline Chez Scheme
That's hard to say. Racket is a rather complete language, as is F# and Elixir. And F# and Racket are extremely capable multi-paradigm languages, supporting basically any paradigm. Elixir is a bit more restricted in terms of its paradigms, but that's a feature oftentimes, and it also makes up for it with its process framework and deep VM support from the BEAM.
I would say that the key difference is that F# and Elixir are backed by industry whereas Racket is primarily backed via academia. Thus, the incentives and goals are more aligned for F# and Elixir to be used in industrial settings.
Also, both F# and Elixir gain a lot from their host VMs in the CLR and BEAM. Overall, F# is the cleanest language of the three, as it is easy to write concise imperative, functional, or OOP code and has easy asynchronous facilities. Elixir supports macros, and although Racket's macro system is far more advanced, I don't think it really provides any measurable utility over Elixir's. I would also say that F# and Elixir's documentation is better than Racket's. Racket has a lot of documentation, but it can be a little terse at times. And Elixir definitely has the most active, vibrant, and complete ecosystem of all three languages, as well as job market.
The last thing is that F# and Elixir have extremely good notebook implementations in Polyglot Notebooks (https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=ms-dotne...) and Livebook (https://livebook.dev/), respectively. I would say both of these exceed the standard Python Jupyter notebook, and Racket doesn't have anything like Polyglot Notebooks or Livebook. (As an aside, it's possible for someone to implement a Racket kernel for Polyglot Notebooks, so maybe that's a good side project for me.)
So for me, over time, it has slowly whittled down to F# and Elixir being my two languages that I reach for to handle effectively any project. Racket just doesn't pull me in that direction, and I would say that Racket is a bit too locked to DrRacket. I tried doing some GUI stuff in Racket, and despite it having an already built framework, I have actually found it easier to write my own due to bugs found and the poor performance of Racket Draw.
-
Runme – Interactive Runbooks Built with Markdown
This looks very similar to LiveBook¹. It is purely Elixir/BEAM based, but is quite polished and seems like a perfect workflow tool that is also able to expose these workflows (simply called livebooks) as web apps that some functional, non-technical person can execute on his/her own.
1: https://livebook.dev/
- Livebook: Automate code and data workflows with interactive notebooks
What are some alternatives?
mercury - Convert Jupyter Notebooks to Web Apps
kino - Client-driven interactive widgets for Livebook
streamlit - Streamlit — A faster way to build and share data apps.
awesome-advent-of-code - A collection of awesome resources related to the yearly Advent of Code challenge.
papermill - 📚 Parameterize, execute, and analyze notebooks
interactive - .NET Interactive combines the power of .NET with many other languages to create notebooks, REPLs, and embedded coding experiences. Share code, explore data, write, and learn across your apps in ways you couldn't before.
PyMe - PyMe is a tool software to develop the Python User Interface for Python programmer.
Genie.jl - 🧞The highly productive Julia web framework
ipyflex - A WYSIWYG layout editor for Jupyter widgets
Elixir - Elixir is a dynamic, functional language for building scalable and maintainable applications
Solara - A Pure Python, React-style Framework for Scaling Your Jupyter and Web Apps
axon - Nx-powered Neural Networks