vim-signify VS vim-doge

Alterntatively, I've been using vim-signify, as we use subversion at work

I wonder why beneath the plus (from vim-signify) the colorscheme is not fully extending to edge of the screen.

That said, Neovim can still run most Vimscript plugins just fine, so you can still use https://github.com/chrisbra/changesPlugin (and https://github.com/airblade/vim-gitgutter and https://github.com/mhinz/vim-signify/, which are mentioned in the README) if you want.

vim-signify or git gutter can do this for files managed by git.

And it happens fairly regularly. This particular error happens in the https://github.com/mhinz/vim-signify plugin, but I would get this same error from different plugins as well.

mhinz/vim-signify highlights the changes similarly to git-gutter

I've given up vim-gitgutter for mhinz/vim-signify because of performance. But vim-gitgutter has this one killer feature for staging the hunk currently under the cursor. This feature doesn't exist elsewhere.

I use :Gdiffsplit from https://github.com/tpope/vim-fugitive which opens a diff window. And I use https://github.com/mhinz/vim-signify to have some info at all time

I’m the creator of the vim plugin called vim-doge and I like to share some awesome benchmark results with the new version that has been written in Rust.

Don't get me started on how every compelling docstring generator seems to be some vendor-locked plugin: (DoxyDoxygen, vim-doge, autoDocstring)

Something like this? https://github.com/kkoomen/vim-doge

https://github.com/kkoomen/vim-doge is great generator for nearly any language

I'm not sure I understand what the plug-in does. Is it similar to vim-doge for generating documentation?

This does not really find a solution to indentation, but this post shows vim-doge which help generating jsdoc (and others). Maybe you could take a look and find this useful.

vim-doge

I can recommend vim-doge; it works great for me and supports a variety of Python docstring formatting standards.