vim-quickui VS yazz

I agree with the article. Turbo Pascal was terrific. There is some kind of psychological thing that has me using neovim in a terminal all the time for many years.

I guess it's convenient for ssh. But I miss the conveniences of Borland IDEs. Even last night I was working on a web application and was tempted to add a menu at the top of the page, remembering how useful they were back in Turbo Pascal and such.

I did a Google search and found this https://github.com/skywind3000/vim-quickui

skywind3000/vim-quickui

You can see this project to base yourself: https://github.com/skywind3000/vim-quickui

maybe not directly related to the question, this project makes vim look like TurboC, the author mentions, that he has configuration that does so. https://github.com/skywind3000/vim-quickui

would love to see - cascading menu - ability to click in menu like in https://github.com/skywind3000/vim-quickui/

Are you familiar with https://github.com/skywind3000/vim-quickui ? Maybe you will find some inspiration there.

I assume you mean something similar to the GUI menubar in emacs? Currently this isn't possible in rust, which is what we use, but its somewhat possible within vim as well (https://github.com/skywind3000/vim-quickui). Considering vim is very keyboard centric, a gui menu doesn't appeal to me much

I guess he was using this plugin: https://github.com/skywind3000/vim-quickui

Maybe this will help a bit, this person made a lot of really cool Vim UI components, like a Preview window. https://github.com/skywind3000/vim-quickui#preview-window

Shameless plug. My own one of course :)

https://github.com/yazz/yazz

You can also try one I am building, a cross between Visual Basic and Microsoft Access here:

https://yazz.com/

i am working on such a thing myself at https://github.com/yazz/yazz. Also there are many other people trying to build something similar

I keep hacking away on Yazz for over 10 years now.... even if there is zero payoff I keep hacking... and that is what hackers do... we are not doing for the money... https://github.com/yazz/yazz

I really loved this talk and feel for Evan. As someone who was a VC/Angel investor in the space (I was the initial angel investor for something called LightTable/Eve) back in the day, worked for a couple of years at Red Hat, and am working on my own Open Source Language here: https://github.com/yazz/yazz (so yes, you could say I am a VC trying to build a low code product with my own hands), so I feel I have a valid opinions on this. I think that it is possible to make money in opensource as a little guy, but you need to have a combination of consulting, hosting, and support services. If your product is not able to encapsulate being sold and packaged as something that is possible to demo and sell to customers then you will most likely struggle to make a living from it

I am actually trying to make an open source successor, but using Javascript instead of Basic, at https://github.com/yazz/yazz and a demo at yazz.com

I'm still building a low code system with an easy to use component marketplace where you can edit components within the low code tool. Still a work in progress: https://github.com/yazz/yazz

Author of a framework that also stores it's code in IPFS for easy sharing (https://github.com/yazz/yazz). ScrapScript is a really nice concept with how it stores code. I originally got the idea for storing the code as a hash of the contents from Unison, and it looks like the idea is really starting to catch on with more and more languages now. Well done!

I’m working on a low core project that is already using content addressable source code that is stored in IPFS at https://github.com/yazz/yazz so it can be done

There are already some Dbos type systems out there. I built one which stores program state in SQLite databases and process state and programs are also stored in SQLite. In the oat I believe things like silver stream did the same too. The project I made is open source too: https://github.com/yazz/yazz