ut VS Google Test

I don't think stepping through static_assert is a thing? Curious if it is, though. Since constexpr is either run-time or compile-time and static_assert is not a poor man's debugging facility could be to -Dstatic_assert(...) assert(__VA_ARGS__) and gdb the code. Alternatively, a more refined solution would be to use an UT framework (for example https://github.com/boost-ext/ut) which helps with that. IMHO, TDD can also limit the requirement of stepping into the code and with gurantees that the code is memory safe and UB safe there is less need for sanitizers and valgrind etc. depending on the coverage.

It was not easy, I had to modify Boost UT to get it to run my tests. It doesn't support type-parametrized tests when the type parameter is non-copiable, which was the case for me. This is a symptom of a larger issue, which is that it relies on std::apply and std::tuple to generate the type-parametrized tests, which in turns requires instantiating the tuple and the contained objects (even though these instances aren't actually used; eh). That's a no go for me, since I need to carefully monitor when instance are created, and this was throwing off my test code. I had to effectively disable these checks to get it to run without failures. Then there was a similar issue with expect(), which doesn't work if part of the expression is non-copiable. I reported these issues to them.

https://github.com/boost-ext/ut (for better user interface when defining tests without macros)

https://github.com/boost-ext/ut from Kris Jusiak is worth checking

C++: C++ has quite a number of benchmarking libraries some of the recent ones involving C++ 20's flexibility. The most notable being Google Bench and UT. C does not have many specific benchmarking libraries, but you can easily integrate C code with C++ benchmarking libraries in order to test the performance of your C code.

UT

In Boost.UT there is a number of different styles to add a parametrized test case. All of them are pretty cryptic bue to heavy isage of oeverloaded operators of custom "non-public" classes. Except for the for-loop method, in all other methods the list of parameter values goes after the test procedure definition. I find this inconvenient, as I want to see list of parameter value next to the test name. This is what I used to from the times I was coding a lot of unit tests in C#.

cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 3.5) project(knn_cpp CXX) include(FetchContent) FetchContent_Declare( googletest GIT_REPOSITORY https://github.com/google/googletest.git GIT_TAG release-1.11.0 ) FetchContent_MakeAvailable(googletest) FetchContent_Declare(matplotplusplus GIT_REPOSITORY https://github.com/alandefreitas/matplotplusplus GIT_TAG origin/master) FetchContent_GetProperties(matplotplusplus) if(NOT matplotplusplus_POPULATED) FetchContent_Populate(matplotplusplus) add_subdirectory(${matplotplusplus_SOURCE_DIR} ${matplotplusplus_BINARY_DIR} EXCLUDE_FROM_ALL) endif() function(knn_cpp_test TEST_NAME TEST_SOURCE) add_executable(${TEST_NAME} ${TEST_SOURCE}) target_link_libraries(${TEST_NAME} PUBLIC matplot) aux_source_directory(${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/../lib LIB_SOURCES) target_link_libraries(${TEST_NAME} PRIVATE gtest gtest_main gmock gmock_main) target_include_directories(${TEST_NAME} PRIVATE ${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR} ${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/../) target_sources(${TEST_NAME} PRIVATE ${LIB_SOURCES} ) include(GoogleTest) gtest_discover_tests(${TEST_NAME}) endfunction() knn_cpp_test(LinearAlgebraTest la_test.cc) knn_cpp_test(KnnTest knn_test.cc) knn_cpp_test(UtilsTest utils_test.cc)

Okay, time to start unit tests!!! We will use Unity Test Framework to do unit testing. It is one of widely used testing frameworks alongside with Check, Google Test etc. Just downloading source code, and putting it to the project folder is enough to make it work (that is also why it is portable).

Updating GCC (it happened to GoogleTest).

Roy's project uses Google Test, a C++ testing framework. His testing setup is similar to mine as we both keep source files in one directory and tests in another. The key difference is that I can run the tests using the Visual Studios run button. It was fairly easy to write the new tests as there were existing ones that I could reference to check the syntax!

The Google Test Documentation provides a primer for first-time users. The primer introduces some basic concepts and terminology, some of which I've been able to learn for this lab exercise.

> git submodule add https://github.com/google/googletest.git > git submodule update --init --recursive

cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 3.14) project(my_project) # GoogleTest requires at least C++14 set(CMAKE_CXX_STANDARD 14) set(CMAKE_CXX_STANDARD_REQUIRED ON) include(FetchContent) FetchContent_Declare( googletest URL https://github.com/google/googletest/archive/03597a01ee50ed33e9dfd640b249b4be3799d395.zip ) # For Windows: Prevent overriding the parent project's compiler/linker settings set(gtest_force_shared_crt ON CACHE BOOL "" FORCE) FetchContent_MakeAvailable(googletest) enable_testing() add_executable( hello_test hello_test.cpp ) target_link_libraries( hello_test GTest::gtest_main ) include(GoogleTest) gtest_discover_tests(hello_test)

FetchContent\_Declare(googletestGIT\_REPOSITORY [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected]):googletest.git [https://github.com/google/googletest.git](https://github.com/google/googletest.git)GIT\_TAG release-1.12.1)FetchContent\_MakeAvailable(googletest)

Not sure about CppUnit but I can speak to my previous experience using the googletest framework which compiles your tests to an executable, and since it's a very simple framework we were able to cross-compile and run directly on our device. We just had to hook up a device to the server that was running the CI so it could flash it when needed. That basically meant that our process was: