undercover
undercover warns about methods, classes and blocks that were changed without tests, to help you easily find untested code and reduce the number of bugs. It does so by analysing data from git diffs, code structure and SimpleCov coverage reports (by grodowski)
Rubycritic
A Ruby code quality reporter (by whitesmith)
undercover | Rubycritic | |
---|---|---|
1 | 4 | |
714 | 3,287 | |
- | 0.3% | |
7.0 | 6.6 | |
3 months ago | 17 days ago | |
Ruby | Ruby | |
MIT License | MIT License |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
undercover
Posts with mentions or reviews of undercover.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects.
-
In Pursuit of Perfect Code Coverage Reporting
Nice one! You could also take a look at the undercover gem for nicely formatted GitHub Checks (it's my open source CLI also available as a GitHub app)
Rubycritic
Posts with mentions or reviews of Rubycritic.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-01-17.
-
First commits in a Ruby on Rails app
The third commit adds Rubycritic as a code quality static analysis.
-
Improve Code in Your Ruby Application with RubyCritic
You should consider using RubyCritic if you want a single place to review code improvements for your project. Including RubyCritic in your development process will certainly reduce the time a development team spends working on technical debts. Most technical debts will be mapped out at development time.
-
Best services and/or gems for automated generation of documentation, unit tests, and useful things of this nature
It's also possible to write unit tests in order to better understand or surface your assumptions about a legacy application. I'd also consider running rubycritic against legacy code, to see where the code smells and other hot spots lie.
-
How to Improve Code Quality on a Ruby on Rails Application
RubyCritic: a gem that wraps around static analysis gems such as Reek, Flay, and Flog to provide a quality report of your Ruby code.
What are some alternatives?
When comparing undercover and Rubycritic you can also consider the following projects:
SimpleCov - Code coverage for Ruby with a powerful configuration library and automatic merging of coverage across test suites
Rubocop - A Ruby static code analyzer and formatter, based on the community Ruby style guide. [Moved to: https://github.com/rubocop/rubocop]
rails_best_practices - a code metric tool for rails projects
Brakeman - A static analysis security vulnerability scanner for Ruby on Rails applications
MetricFu - A fist full of code metrics
Reek - Code smell detector for Ruby
Coverband - Ruby production code coverage collection and reporting (line of code usage)
Fasterer - :zap: Don't make your Rubies go fast. Make them go fasterer ™. :zap:
Pronto - Quick automated code review of your changes
Pippi - pippi