ubicloud
daytona
| ubicloud | daytona | |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | 6 | |
| 3,065 | 5,449 | |
| 3.9% | 10.1% | |
| 9.9 | 9.7 | |
| 5 days ago | about 7 hours ago | |
| Ruby | Go | |
| GNU Affero General Public License v3.0 | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
ubicloud
- FLaNK AI for 11 March 2024
-
Show HN: Open-source x64 and Arm GitHub runners. Reduces GitHub Actions bill 10x
The docs still say the Elastic license is used but looking at https://github.com/ubicloud/ubicloud/blob/main/LICENSE it looks like the project might have switched to GNU Affero General Public License v3.0 in the last day.
- GitHub - ubicloud/ubicloud: Open, free, and portable cloud. Elastic compute, block storage (non replicated), and virtual networking services in public alpha.
-
Ask HN: How does your company balance test coverage and deploy speed?
At Ubicloud, we have 100% line and branch coverage that is mandated on every PR (https://github.com/ubicloud/ubicloud). We also have an E2E test suite that we run periodically and with every commit. We did not really feel like our tests are slowing us down, it actually makes us faster since we have a higher trust to the payload and many manual checks that would need to be done is safely skipped.
-
Ubicloud – open, free and portable cloud
> Taken from here: https://ubicloud.com/
Am I the only one getting a certificate error browsing there?
-
Ask HN: Thoughts about Elastic V2, SSPL, or mixed software licenses?
Link to our project: https://github.com/ubicloud/ubicloud
We’re choosing Elastic V2 for three reasons: (1) We’re planning to monetize through a managed service and we’d like the license to support that, (2) Later if we change our mind, we think it’s easier on our users if we go from a restrictive license to a more permissive one, and (3) The Elastic V2 license is much simpler than its cousin, Server Side Public License (SSPL).
That said, Elastic V2 is a new license and doesn’t seem to as popular as SSPL. Also, some projects out there mix and match multiple licenses in their repo to be able to call themselves open source.
Any insights / feedback on Elastic V2 or software licenses in general?
- Attribute-Based Access Control (ABAC) Implementation in 130 Lines of Code
daytona
- FLaNK AI for 11 March 2024
-
Show HN: Daytona – Open-Source Dev Env Manager from a 15-Year Journey
It does under Why Daytona https://github.com/daytonaio/daytona?tab=readme-ov-file#why-...
Or do u suggest we move this all the way up?
Thanks
What are some alternatives?
manageiq - ManageIQ Open-Source Management Platform
devbox - Instant, easy, and predictable development environments
fog-azure-rm - Fog for Azure Resource Manager
coder - Coder provisions software development environments via Terraform on Linux, macOS, Windows, X86, ARM, and of course, Kubernetes.
cloudfront-signer - Ruby gem for signing AWS CloudFront private content URLs and streaming paths.
ldhdns - A developer tool for providing DNS for Docker containers running on a Linux host.
AWS SDK for Ruby - The official AWS SDK for Ruby.
tilt - Define your dev environment as code. For microservice apps on Kubernetes. [Moved to: https://github.com/tilt-dev/tilt]
forem - For empowering community 🌱
FastChat - An open platform for training, serving, and evaluating large language models. Release repo for Vicuna and Chatbot Arena.
homebrew-portable-ruby - 🚗 Versions of Ruby that can be installed and run from anywhere on the filesystem.
envd - 🏕️ Reproducible development environment