ubicloud
bruno
ubicloud | bruno | |
---|---|---|
16 | 55 | |
3,065 | 19,743 | |
3.9% | 11.8% | |
9.9 | 9.9 | |
4 days ago | 6 days ago | |
Ruby | JavaScript | |
GNU Affero General Public License v3.0 | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
ubicloud
- FLaNK AI for 11 March 2024
-
Show HN: Open-source x64 and Arm GitHub runners. Reduces GitHub Actions bill 10x
The docs still say the Elastic license is used but looking at https://github.com/ubicloud/ubicloud/blob/main/LICENSE it looks like the project might have switched to GNU Affero General Public License v3.0 in the last day.
- GitHub - ubicloud/ubicloud: Open, free, and portable cloud. Elastic compute, block storage (non replicated), and virtual networking services in public alpha.
-
Ask HN: How does your company balance test coverage and deploy speed?
At Ubicloud, we have 100% line and branch coverage that is mandated on every PR (https://github.com/ubicloud/ubicloud). We also have an E2E test suite that we run periodically and with every commit. We did not really feel like our tests are slowing us down, it actually makes us faster since we have a higher trust to the payload and many manual checks that would need to be done is safely skipped.
-
Ubicloud – open, free and portable cloud
> Taken from here: https://ubicloud.com/
Am I the only one getting a certificate error browsing there?
-
Ask HN: Thoughts about Elastic V2, SSPL, or mixed software licenses?
Link to our project: https://github.com/ubicloud/ubicloud
We’re choosing Elastic V2 for three reasons: (1) We’re planning to monetize through a managed service and we’d like the license to support that, (2) Later if we change our mind, we think it’s easier on our users if we go from a restrictive license to a more permissive one, and (3) The Elastic V2 license is much simpler than its cousin, Server Side Public License (SSPL).
That said, Elastic V2 is a new license and doesn’t seem to as popular as SSPL. Also, some projects out there mix and match multiple licenses in their repo to be able to call themselves open source.
Any insights / feedback on Elastic V2 or software licenses in general?
- Attribute-Based Access Control (ABAC) Implementation in 130 Lines of Code
bruno
-
🛠️Non-AI Open Source Projects that are 🔥
Bruno is a Git-friendly API client. Feature-wise, what makes it stand out from other popular GUI API clients out there is that Bruno stores your collections directly in a folder on your filesystem and it's a desktop app made for offline use.
- What happens when an HTTP client raises $225M at a $5.6B valuation
- FLaNK AI for 11 March 2024
-
When 'open core' projects reject contributions for competing with the EE
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39653718 https://www.usebruno.com/
Good timing to find alternatives.
-
Bruno
Especially once a VC gets into the fold.
We will never take VC funding. We received around 10 inbound reach outs from VCs till date and have denied funding from all of them. We will remain independent and I have written about it in detail here https://www.usebruno.com/blog/bootstrapping
> I didn't stick with Bruno. I think it was due to not having an equivalent to Postman's pre-request scripts.
Bruno has come a long way, we support pre-request scripts and a lot more
> But can it handle oauth2? I had to write a httpie script recently just to test an oauth2 api.
We have released oauth2 support, some rough edges are being polished
> Good thing it's open source. Money being involved, I don't have long term hopes for it's openness.
I understand this is a hard problem. We are fully bootstrapped and independent. We earn money via selling the Golden Edition. We will build more developer products in the long term, and the goal is to make even the golden edition features also open source in the future. In the unlikely case of me going dark (dead/incapacitated to lead the project), I have instructed our small team (2 FT employees) and my family to release our golden edition features too to the community as opensource. I am committed to this cause.
Some good links where I have discussed about opensource, freedom and monetization
- https://www.usebruno.com/blog/bootstrapping
- https://github.com/usebruno/bruno/discussions/269
If you'd like to pre-order the golden edition: https://www.usebruno.com/pricing
Thank you for all the love and kind words, HN!
-
Ask HN: What Underrated Open Source Project Deserves More Recognition?
Have you heard of the Bruno project? It's an open-source alternative to subscription-based API testing applications like Postman and Insomnia. It's gaining popularity and deserves more attention. Plus, since it's open-source, users can enjoy full privacy. Check it out at https://github.com/usebruno/bruno.
-
Tools that Make Me Productive as a Software Engineer
Now, I'm looking at trying Bruno, a new tool I heard about. Bruno has all the features you'd want, like support for websockets. What's great about Bruno is it only costs $19 for a one-time payment, which seems like a good deal. I want to see how well it works for me and if it's as good as it sounds. I'm excited to try it out and maybe talk about it later.
-
15 open-source tools to elevate your software design workflow
In contrast to Postman, Bruno aims to be an offline-first API client which stores requests in a local folder. You can still collaborate using Git, but everything else happens on your machine. Bruno turns out to be a great solution when you just want to run HTTP requests. It supports a lot of features you might know from Postman or Insomnia (set environment variables, several authentication methods, and scripted tests, to name a few). Looking at the roadmap, the amount of these is only going to increase.
- Bruno: Re-Inventing the API Client
- Bruno is a Fast and Git-Friendly open source API client
What are some alternatives?
manageiq - ManageIQ Open-Source Management Platform
insomnium - Insomnium is a fast local API testing tool that is privacy-focused and 100% local. For testing GraphQL, REST, WebSockets and gRPC. This is a fork of Kong/insomnia
fog-azure-rm - Fog for Azure Resource Manager
Hoppscotch - Open source API development ecosystem.
cloudfront-signer - Ruby gem for signing AWS CloudFront private content URLs and streaming paths.
insomnia - The open-source, cross-platform API client for GraphQL, REST, WebSockets, SSE and gRPC. With Cloud, Local and Git storage.
AWS SDK for Ruby - The official AWS SDK for Ruby.
Restfox - Offline-First Minimalistic HTTP & Socket Testing Client for the Web & Desktop
forem - For empowering community 🌱
httpie - 🥧 HTTPie CLI — modern, user-friendly command-line HTTP client for the API era. JSON support, colors, sessions, downloads, plugins & more.
homebrew-portable-ruby - 🚗 Versions of Ruby that can be installed and run from anywhere on the filesystem.
milkman - An Extensible Request/Response Workbench