tweet2doom VS ioccc-obfuscated-c-contest

Someone beat him to it. https://twitter.com/tweet2doom

Hi Reddit, This is my fun side project of running Doom on Twitter! The basic idea is that the u/tweet2doom account is a Twitter bot that responds with gameplay videos based on the input that you provide it. The cool feature is that you can continue playing the game from any previous state by simply replying to the corresponding tweet. For more information how to use it, please read the instructions in the pinned tweet. If you want to make your own Twitter bot that plays Doom, checkout my Github repo: https://github.com/ggerganov/tweet2doom It provides the source code that runs the bot. You will need some basic knowledge of how to use the Twitter API. Let me know if you need any extra information about getting it to run. Getting started can be a bit confusing at first so here is a sample link to a game progression that we did last night with a stranger: https://twitter.com/tweet2doom/status/1445845544748740612 We managed to complete level E1M1 after quite some effort :D Also, I found that a cool way to explore the game state is to use the Treeverse app. Here is a sample link with the current conversation tree with all existing @tweet2doom nodes so far: https://treeverse.app/view/4jByHS3Y For those curious enough, there are some Easter eggs in the Load Game menu - see if you can find them ;) Would love to hear what you think and I will be happy to play some moves with you tonight!

Tangentially related - you can play a turn-based Doom (1993) on Twitter:

https://twitter.com/tweet2doom/status/1444355917160534024

There is a tree explorer that shows you all moves that have been played so far by everyone [0]. If you are interested how I made this, you can check the Github repo [1].

[0] - https://tweet2doom.github.io

[1] - https://github.com/ggerganov/tweet2doom

A semi-automated system that compares old unsafe code to new unsafe code would likely be really helpful here - say, a LLM prompted to investigate whether the new unsafe blocks are a significant difference in scope and documented intent from the old unsafe blocks. Unless the winners of https://www.ioccc.org/ are among your attackers, it's a pretty solid line of defense.

For that you can go savor the archives of IOCCC : https://www.ioccc.org/

>> Perl can also be hilariously unreadable: https://www.foo.be/docs/tpj/issues/vol4_3/tpj0403-0017.html

Most programming languages can be obfuscated. That does not mean people write code in those programming languages like that:

C: https://www.ioccc.org/

Javascript: view-source:https://www.google.com/

The truth is that insulting Perl is considered stylish by some, so many people do despite knowing little to nothing about Perl and having never used it.

If you want the most complex, then probably here https://www.ioccc.org/

Since someone already linked Enterprise FizzBuzz, I'll link The Obfuscated C Contest as a possible source of inspiration.

Or this one [3] that calculates pi by estimating its own surface area.

Or this one [4]. It's a lovers quarrel, written simultaneously in C and English. It's incredible, seriously, read it.

[0]: https://www.ioccc.org/

I wonder what sort of "English" it spits out when fed obfuscated C code

OP is going to rage quit when he sees https://www.ioccc.org/

I mean, its no https://www.ioccc.org/ entry

The International Obfuscated C Code Contest for all you brain damage needs.