turf VS flamegraph

to measure distances and convert between our parameters I'm using TurfJS, for which binding is even more trivial:

Turf.js is an open-source geospatial analysis library that can process various location data, such as the center of gravity and distance calculations.

Isochrones are manually calculated using turf.js assuming 1.2m/s walking speed after the subway trip. These are simple buffers around each station/prior isochrone and do not take the street network into account.

Not to take away from you learning, which I think is awesome, I was wondering if you know about http://turfjs.org/ which provides a lot of simple modules … and is surprisingly hard to find. Their `distance` modules may be relevant in this case.

you can use client side libraries like Turfjs to do buffers https://github.com/Turfjs/turf/tree/master/packages/turf-buffer

Tools: custom Javascript (with heavy use of turf.js) for data processing and creating the 3D model, Blender, 3D printing, lost wax casting

I've integrated https://turfjs.org/ with mapbox before and it was pretty fun

References Amazon Location Service Turf.js MapLibre GL JS Leaflet OpenLayers Cesium Mapbox GL JS

You can install cargo-flamegraph with cargo install flamegraph. There are some underlying requirements to be able to use cargo-flamegraph; you will want to take a look at the repo here to make sure you have the right dependencies.

I tried to diagnose the issue with flamegraph, but unfortunately the flamegraph didn't show anything beyond the next call for some reason

having some tools to identify slowness origins (flamegraph is one... but not sure it's the way to go)

I'm currently implementing a solution for the first part of the day 16. It work but it is really slow... I'd like to : - understand why - having some tools to identify slowness origins (flamegraph is one... but not sure it's the way to go) - eventually have some clue/solution/idea - have general feedback on what in my "coding style" is not appropriate for rust (I come from java/kotlin/ts even if I've already coded a bit in c/c++) : for example I love iterator & sequence but i feel they are not really suited to overuse in rust (mostly because of async & result).

Use a profiler. Flamegraph is a good way to visualise profiler output. This lets you identify which functions are taking up a large amount of time - and hence helps you identify where to focus your optimisation efforts.

You tried trying to see what takes the most time under load via flames? https://github.com/flamegraph-rs/flamegraph

Well, in cases like that the answer is straight forward, use a profiler like https://github.com/flamegraph-rs/flamegraph

I don't see any obvious problems with your algorithm. I've had luck using cargo-flamegraph to identify the slow parts of my code. That's going to show you which parts to focus on improving the performance of!

From the readme of cargo flamegraph: