undo-tree VS StyleCopAnalyzers

vundo is a simpler implementation: it reuses Emacs's tree and just implements the visualisation part.

undo-tree is a reimplementation of Emacs's tree based undo, that supports a visualization.

* undo-tree LOC: 4700. https://gitlab.com/tsc25/undo-tree/-/blob/master/undo-tree.e...

* vundo LOC: 1350. https://github.com/casouri/vundo/blob/master/vundo.el

That said, the situations seems murky still: the version in ELPA is newer (0.7.5), but it's still outdated, the home page advertises 0.8.2 as the latest version. And it moved to a different repository location. And looking at its history, it seems to never have included the version 0.7.5: https://gitlab.com/tsc25/undo-tree/-/commit/5da2a7aee98393d26a93c499dc79fcf793f161e1

It’s easier to mentally map that the default behaviour undo/redo for Emacs (which is not unreasonable, just complex).

The source for undo-tree contains documentation which very effectively describes the way the library works with examples and comparisons with how Emacs does things by default: https://gitlab.com/tsc25/undo-tree/-/blob/master/undo-tree.e...

Looks like the repo is moved to https://gitlab.com/tsc25/undo-tree

By default, Renovate ignores preview versions of dependencies. For NuGet, a preview version is a package whose version contains a semantic suffix such as -alpha, -beta, -rc. There are some well-known NuGet packages that are only available in preview versions. For example, Aspire.Hosting will likely remain in preview until the release of .NET 9, StyleCop.Analyzers has been in beta for already 5 years, while OpenTelemetry.Instrumentation.GrpcNetClient and Azure.AI.OpenAI have never had a stable version.

Several well-known NuGet packages such as xUnit.net, FluentAssertions, StyleCop, Entity Framework Core, and others include by default a significant number of Roslyn analyzers. They help you adhere to the conventions and best practices of these libraries.

I created a StyleCopAnalysers.ruleset file at the root of my project, which contains the ruleset for analysis. The tool not only identifies issues but also attempts to fix them, providing a log of any unresolved problems. In addition to running the analyzer upon build, the dotnet format command also runs any external analyzers that it detects by default as well.

https://github.com/DotNetAnalyzers/StyleCopAnalyzers the successor to stylecop - most of the rules ported over

I'm a C# guy, so that is what I care about. For .NET we do have StyleCop analyzers. And EditorConfig exists to help at the IDE level across all languages. And git itself can be configured with such things as eol and autoclrf.

I'd also like to know how to clean up based on rules like SA1507 - never more than one blank line in a row, and related rules to remove blank likes after { and before }

StyleCop is from Microsoft: https://github.com/DotNetAnalyzers/StyleCopAnalyzers

Using their own APIs, Roslyn Analyzers verifies certain conditions about the source code and, if necessary, feeds back into the compiler in the form of compilation warnings and errors. An example would be StyleCop.

StyleCop.Analyzers