transferred-stepzen-schemas VS Next.js

Go to stepzen.com and click on the start for free button.

Either way, I'm not too familiar with RxDB but looking at the docs you can also use StepZen to create the GraphQL layer that you use for replication. With StepZen you can build and deploy a GraphQL API based on multiple datasources (including MSSQL) in minutes. That way you only have to worry about building the logic that pulls and push replicates data to and from GraphQL. How you structure the MSSQL database would become the most important part of this project, to ensure a smooth replication.

There are multiple ways to get a GraphQL API on top off a Postgres database. If you want to have a GraphQL abstraction layer that runs as a hosted service and needs almost no code, have a look at StepZen. You can build a GraphQL API for the Postgres database by following the docs here. StepZen introspects the database (using stepzen import postgresql) and let it create the schema for you based on all the tables and columns of your database. Including a set of queries to get started with.

If you’re looking for a managed service, have a look atStepZen. You can combine multiple GraphQL schemas into one cloud GraphQL API. Instead of writing a gateway yourself, you can use SDL to merge different schemas. Besides GraphQL APIs you can also “federate” other data sources like SQL or REST

There are many of them, including StepZen which is language/framework agnostic and let you create a GraphQL server with GraphQL SDL only - in a declarative way

I’ve seen more products letting you join/merge GraphQL schemas independent of schema stitching or federation. Have a look at GraphQL Mesh or StepZen.

You can save yourself the hassle of having to build a GraphQL server, resolvers and database connections with StepZen (https://stepzen.com). It’s a product that is based solely on GraphQL SDL and you set the database connections with directives. Also, you can use it to connect other APIs

There is one thing I can say for sure: I love the spirit of open source. I've had a wonderful time working with open source communities of different sizes (e.g. Seneca-CDOT, StepZen, Appwrite, and Zulip). Fortunately, all of them are fantastic and patient with beginners.

If the only thing you're trying to do is converting a REST API to GraphQL, you should have a look at https://stepzen.com/

StepZen filed an issue about writing a GraphQL schema to integrate SpaceX REST API into their React application. I found this as an excellent opportunity for me to learn GraphQL.

Next.js is a powerful React framework that enables developers to build server-rendered applications, static websites, and more. It's designed for production and provides features like automatic code splitting and optimized prefetching.

// source: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/packages/next/src/lib/worker.ts#L121C15-L129C16 for (;;) { onActivity() const result = await Promise.race(\[ (this.\_worker as any)\[method\](...args), restartPromise, \]) if (result !== RESTARTED) return result if (onRestart) onRestart(method, args, ++attempts) }

https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/27666 One of them said 'renaming folder to uppercase' might cause trouble. git might not recognize case-sensetive changes by default.

Next.js has long cemented itself as one of the front runners in the web framework world for JavaScript/TypeScript projects so we’re going to be using that. More specifically we’re going to be using V14 of Next.js which allows us to use some exciting new features like Server Actions and the App Router.

Web frameworks like Next.js will usually include this feature, but do check that they set the caching headers correctly!

Vite and Next.js are both top 5 modern development framework right now. They are both great depending on your use case so we’ll discuss 4 areas: Architecture, main features, developer experience and production readiness. After learning about these we’ll have a better idea of which one is best for your project.

> It’s important to be aware of what you are getting if you go with React, and what you are getting is a far cry from what a framework would offer, with all the corresponding pros and cons.

Would you like to elaborate on that?

In my experience, with something as great, size/ecosystem-wise as React, there will almost always be at least one "mainstream" package for whatever you might want to do with it, that integrates pretty well. Where a lot of things might come out of the box with a framework, with a library I often find myself just needing to install the "right" package, and from there it's pretty much the same.

For example, using https://angular.io/guide/i18n-overview or installing and using https://react.i18next.com/

Or something like https://angular.io/guide/form-validation out of the box, vs installing and using https://formik.org/

Or perhaps https://angular.io/guide/router vs https://reactrouter.com/en/main

Even adding something that's not there out of the box is pretty much the same, like https://primeng.org/ or https://primereact.org/

React will typically have more fragmentation and therefore also choice, but I don't see those two experiences as that different. Updates and version management/supply chain will inevitably be more of a mess with the library, admittedly.

Now, projects like Next https://nextjs.org/ exist and add what some might regard as the missing pieces and work well if you want something opinionated and with lots of features out of the box, but a lot of those features (like SSR) are actually pretty advanced and not always even necessary.

Next.js: For the website and the admin dashboard

Until the time of writing, there is no official example of how to enable runtime environmental variables in a Dockerized Next.js app, as utilizing unstable_noStore would only dynamically evaluate variables on the server (node.js runtime). There is also an interesting discussion regarding this topic on GitHub.

next.js is a very popular React framework. remix-adonisjs includes more functionality through the AdonisJS backend ecosystem, and should be easier to self-host and self-manage.