timg VS hauberk

timg is a really nice similar tool that does pixel graphics in the terminal window if supported, falling back to character graphics if not.

The big plus is that it supports SVG images.

https://github.com/hzeller/timg

And it is available via brew/apt/etc.

Take a look at timg. It converts pics and videos into pixel art to display on the terminal.

This image then gets displayed to your terminal using timg (https://github.com/hzeller/timg). If you have a terminal which supports sixel (displays pixels 1 to 1 on your terminal then you can display the images as it. I'm using both alacritty (no-sixel) and kitty (sixel support) in the images shown.

This is C++, but does what you imagine: https://github.com/hzeller/timg

Depending on your definition of "works", you might be satisfied with: https://github.com/hzeller/timg

Actions can be classes too. In fact, check out this game's actions and you'll see what I mean.

Source from the article: https://github.com/munificent/hauberk/blob/db360d9efa714efb6d937c31953ef849c7394a39/lib/src/content/dungeon.dart

Take a look at hauberk: https://munificent.github.io/hauberk/

That Bob Nyquist has a pretty cool roguelike on github called Hauberk written in Dart, amongst a number of other good related dev articles and best practices on his blog.

https://github.com/munificent/hauberk

In my roguelike, all monsters can by default walk and melee. Then each breed of monster may have one or more Move objects. A move represents a kind of special move that a monster may perform along with the logic to decide whether or not the monster wants to. (For example, a move for teleporting away only wants to be used when the monster is near death and trying to flee.)