tezos
By tezos
mi-cho-coq
By nomadic-labs
Our great sponsors
tezos | mi-cho-coq | |
---|---|---|
39 | 7 | |
- | - | |
- | - | |
- | - | |
- | - | |
- | - |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
tezos
Posts with mentions or reviews of tezos.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-05-02.
-
Dear bakers & node operators, a new release candidate version of Octez (v15.0~rc1) is now available.
Appears to be a know known issue, being worked on: https://gitlab.com/tezos/tezos/-/issues/4005
- Trias = totally BS non-sense project
- FreshTezos Sunsets. Please re-delegate
-
Welcome to Jakarta!
Another tutorial for the Tezos Dev Docs is in the works, and should land soon (tezos!5058)
- Every link DEVs interested on Tezos should know
-
What is an example of a good, modern OCaml codebase that I can learn from?
https://gitlab.com/tezos/tezos they have a good on onboarding doc too
-
What is the best way to run a node and bake?
If the packages don't work for you, you can download a pre-compiled binaries archive
-
Optimistic rollup - huge potential for integration with solidity contracts outside of the Tezos ecosystem or not really?
I'm far from an expert, but check this out: https://gitlab.com/tezos/tezos/-/milestones/47 "Users will be able to run unmodified (or with minimal changes) code of smart contracts (either Michelson or Solidity) inside optimistic rollups at much larger speed than on L1." Does this imply that smart contracts from the Eth dimension (Solidity) could be integrated easily to Tezos somehow? Would love to hear devs on this.
-
Hangzhou: what to expect and Tenderbake Block time confusion
Global Table of Constants
- Tezos in-process upgrade bringing timelock for MEV protection, views for efficient internal contract calls, and caching for even lower gas costs. Next upgrade by EOY to swap consensus for fast deterministic finality, and possibly optimistic rollups!
mi-cho-coq
Posts with mentions or reviews of mi-cho-coq.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-05-02.
- Every link DEVs interested on Tezos should know
-
12 reasons Cardano can't scale in 2022
There are similarities between the promises made by Cardano and what you find in Tezos: * proof-of-stake L1s * on-chain voting: Voltaire for Cardano vs periodic elections on Tezos (already 8 important upgrades of the protocol that were voted for, with the Foundation abstaining!) * formal verification of contracts and the chain itself: mentioned here for Cardano vs several projects in Tezos (Mi-Cho-Coq, foobar.land, both using the Coq proof assistant) * ongoing work on L2s: Hydra for Cardano vs Deku, zkRollups and optimistic rollups as well (a bit similar to Arbitrum IIRC).
-
Formal Verification: Tezos’s Feature Nobody Talks About
We are not working with LIGO to verify smart contracts, more with Mi-Cho-Coq which aims to verify smart contracts directly at the Michelson level. Using Mi-Cho-Coq it is possible to verify the Michelson output of LIGO or SmartPy. I heard LIGO people also have projects to do verification directly at the LIGO's level or verify the implementation of the LIGO compiler.
-
Front running and general architecture?
Formal verification for smart contracts. Many (Not all) categories of vulnerabilities can be avoided that way. See fe: https://medium.com/coinmonks/verify-a-smart-contract-with-archetype-6e0ea548e2da or https://gitlab.com/nomadic-labs/mi-cho-coq which can be used on any michelson code.
- About Michelson design
-
ELI5 This “superior tech” Tezos has
The link to the Coq formalization of Michelson, to formally verify smart-contracts: https://gitlab.com/nomadic-labs/mi-cho-coq
-
Supporting EVM, WASM Bitcoin Script, etc.
Web assembly is stack-based and there are tools like KWasm for formal verification - so a move to WASM is a more likely candidate... but Michelson is a very capable and verifiable stack based low-level language too. https://gitlab.com/nomadic-labs/mi-cho-coq/
What are some alternatives?
When comparing tezos and mi-cho-coq you can also consider the following projects:
flow - Adds static typing to JavaScript to improve developer productivity and code quality.
juvix - Juvix empowers developers to write code in a high-level, functional language, compile it to gas-efficient output VM instructions, and formally verify the safety of their contracts prior to deployment and execution.
multisig-timelock - A multisig and timelock contract and CLI for Tezos
cardano-ledger - The ledger implementation and specifications of the Cardano blockchain.
ledger-app-tezos - Ledger app for Tezos
hicdex
tezos-baking - Tools to ease a bakers life
CIPs
morley
tzkt - 😼 Awesome Tezos blockchain indexer and API
Conseil - Query API and indexer for Tezos and other decentralized platforms.