text-to-text-transfer-transformer VS DALLE2-pytorch

Google released the T5 paper about 5 years ago:

https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.10683

This included full model weights along with a detailed description of the dataset, training process, and ablations that led them to that architecture. T5 was state-of-the-art on many benchmarks when it was released, but it was of course quickly eclipsed by GPT-3.

Following GPT-3, it became much more common for labs to not release full details or model weights. Prior to that, it was common practice from Google (BERT, T5), Meta (BART), OpenAI (GPT1, GPT2) and others to release full training details and model weights.

[2] - https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.10683

T5-style relative encodings https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.10683

11. T5: Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer" (2020) - https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.10683 (Google Research)

You can find a link to the paper here: https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.10683

The Text-to-Text Transformer is a type of neural network architecture that is particularly well-suited for natural language processing tasks involving the generation of text. It was introduced in the paper "Attention is All You Need" by Vaswani et al. and has since become a popular choice for many NLP tasks, including language translation, summarization, and text generation

Found relevant code at https://github.com/google-research/text-to-text-transfer-transformer + all code implementations here

I was showing people Dalle2 last year and telling them how much of an impact an open source solution was going to have on, well, everything to do with art and design. (At the time Stable Diffusion had not released, not even the leak, and all hopes was on https://github.com/lucidrains/DALLE2-pytorch)

Stable diffusion is the model, MJ will use a variant and DALL-E is the old version (we have our own implementation from our distinguished fellow Lucidrains here: https://github.com/lucidrains/DALLE2-pytorch)

Sadly I don't think so. From what I understand the architecture is fixed to 1024x1024 pictures.

The code is open source, the model is not I believe. https://github.com/lucidrains/DALLE2-pytorch

Phil Wang has been fairly prolific at creating open source implementations of these text to image models. For example, here is the dalle-2 repo https://github.com/lucidrains/DALLE2-pytorch

There's already an open-source implementation of DALL-E 2 (https://github.com/lucidrains/DALLE2-pytorch) and a pretrained model for it should be released within this year.

Also true for Google's Imagen, which should be even better than DALLE-2 (and faster) https://github.com/lucidrains/imagen-pytorch.

This is possible because the original research papers behind both DALLE-2 and Imagen were publicly released.

The paper describing the model is public and has been implemented here, but that's not the hard part. The model likely requires months of compute and dozens of gigabytes of VRAM to train and run, likely costing several hundred thousand dollars.