flux VS rockstar

flux (https://github.com/tcbrindle/flux) (like ranges::views)

Some people are "Rustifying" their C++ programs also. C++ tooling keeps getting better and libraries like Flux are coming on-line.

Have I got just the thing for you

The code is available on Github of course if you want to check it out, and there's a little bit of documentation covering some of the sequence adaptors and algorithms which are available.

What I've been doing in my projects lately is bundling catch.hpp, then compiling a single catch_main.cpp as a static lib which links to my test exe, and also precompiling catch.hpp when CMake is new enough. You can see an example here.

All Rockstar programs should be published like this!

https://codewithrockstar.com/

what about using https://codewithrockstar.com/

You see that less these days now that it's an actual programming language

More people should learn Rockstar and apply to these jobs

Unless they want you to program in the programming language called rockstar, or sing as an actual rockstar, or sing programs in rockstar as a rockstar

i prefer Rockstar

The Rockstar programming language was created to stop clueless companies from posting asking for "Rockstar coders" since, now that a language called Rockstar exists, they would be getting responses for something they didn't want.

Then Dylan Beattie created the Rockstar programming language so he could call himself a rockstar programmer.