systemd-stable
void-packages
systemd-stable | void-packages | |
---|---|---|
4 | 671 | |
123 | 2,389 | |
4.2% | 1.3% | |
10.0 | 10.0 | |
1 day ago | about 7 hours ago | |
C | Shell | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 only | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
systemd-stable
- Une nouvelle mise à jour de Systemd permettra à Linux de bénéficier de l'infâme "écran bleu de la mort" de Windows, mais la fonctionnalité a reçu un accueil très mitigé
- PSA: Linux 5.16 has major regression in btrfs causing extreme IO load
-
Nasty Linux systemd root level security bug revealed and patched
Most of the new features are being done in separate daemons from the init. The lines of code relevant to only the init are in src/core, so your comparison would probably only make sense if you compared that folder.
>Lennart just keeps adding to systemd and refuses to say when he will finally stop adding to it.
I'm not sure I understand, most projects only stop adding code when development is done. So the answer would probably be "when people stop using it." Are you a distro maintainer? If you want a stable version with fixes backported, you can use this: https://github.com/systemd/systemd-stable
>How many skilled humans on this planet are available to audit those 600k+ lines of systemd code and are actually auditing it? (And how many work for intelligence agencies?)
I'm not sure I understand this either, are you asking how many C programmers there are in the world that are able to perform code review on a C program for Unix like systemd? And what subset of those C programmers work for intelligence agencies? It might be worth answering those questions, but I'm not sure how that is related to systemd specifically.
- Fedora 34 becomes VERY unresponsive when copying large files
void-packages
-
Damn Small Linux 2024
I was looking for a lightweight OS to run on old Asus Eee PC 1005 HA, which uses a 32-bit Intel Atom N270 processor. I installed Void Linux (https://voidlinux.org/).
I may give DSL 2024 a try and see how it compares.
- Chimera Linux
-
When are we ditching systemd?
Linux Void
- Une nouvelle mise à jour de Systemd permettra à Linux de bénéficier de l'infâme "écran bleu de la mort" de Windows, mais la fonctionnalité a reçu un accueil très mitigé
-
How do I update one of these premade ESP32 boards?
My computer is running Void Linux and it has only a wired network connection. I can hook up my phone for USB tethering if I need to connect to the WiFi of the ESP32. How do I update the software without downloading some shady programs from filesharing site links on my system? I have the Arduino IDE and the esptool.py script installed.
- Linuxi kasutaja, mis distrot kodus kasutad ja millest see valik?
- I want to be a packager
-
Hyphens, minus, and dashes in Debian man pages
Classic "everyone is using the software wrong, but it's the fault of everyone, and not the software".
Some distros like Void seem to patch this out.[1]
From mandoc/mdocml's mandoc_char(7) [2]
In roff(7) documents, the minus sign is normally written as ‘\-’. In manual pages, some style guides recommend to also use ‘\-’ if an ASCII 0x2d “hyphen-minus” output glyph that can be copied and pasted is desired in output modes supporting it, for example in -T utf8 and -T html. But currently, no practically relevant manual page formatter requires that subtlety, so in manual pages, it is sufficient to write plain ‘-’ to represent hyphen, minus, and hyphen-minus.
Which is the common-sense thing to do.
Meanwhile, GNU projects become increasingly less relevant due to obnoxiousness like this.
In general the amount of wankery of "the correct hyphen" is staggering.
[1]: https://man.openbsd.org/mandoc_char
[2]: https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/blob/20c66829134...
-
Thoughts on Void Linux?
So I was about to configure a new Archlinux build on my PC and came across Void Linux. I had already read about it a year ago but never researched it in depth. I know that is a Linux distribution made from scratch, with a different package manager and so on. Void Linux users or people who have tried it, what are your thoughts on it? Do you think the PM is easy to use? what about updates and bugs? what desktop or Tilling Window Manager do you use? could you tell me about it?
-
Question about python venv
Good news about dbus-next: https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/46760
What are some alternatives?
openrc - The OpenRC init system
AppImageLauncher - Helper application for Linux distributions serving as a kind of "entry point" for running and integrating AppImages
zen-kernel - Zen Patched Kernel Sources
ungoogled-chromium - Google Chromium, sans integration with Google
calamares - Distribution-independent installer framework
gentoo - Official Gentoo ebuild repository
systemd - The systemd System and Service Manager
nix - Nix, the purely functional package manager
sway - i3-compatible Wayland compositor
xdeb - XDEB - Convert deb (Debian) packages to xbps (Void Linux)
linux-surface - Linux Kernel for Surface Devices
picom - A lightweight compositor for X11