swift-corelibs-xctest
Quick
| swift-corelibs-xctest | Quick | |
|---|---|---|
| - | 3 | |
| 1,121 | 9,764 | |
| 0.2% | 0.1% | |
| 6.7 | 8.0 | |
| 1 day ago | 24 days ago | |
| Swift | Swift | |
| Apache License 2.0 | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
swift-corelibs-xctest
We haven't tracked posts mentioning swift-corelibs-xctest yet.
Tracking mentions began in Dec 2020.
Quick
-
GitHub can't be trusted. Or, how suspending Russian accounts deleted project history and pull requests
Take this example mentioned in the blog post. It was merged into Quick:main from younata:fix_parallel_tests - until the PR was merged, the code resided in the user younata's profile. That's the point of PRs, right? It can't be merged into Quick unless it passes review and is merged. Therefore, when the (allegedly) Russian user's profile was removed it removed all of the commits on their profile - including anything un-merged. Anything already merged, and thus merged to the Quick project repository, has not been changed.
-
Mobile e2e tests using WebdriverIO and Appium
These tests are responsible for validating that a single unit is working properly. You can think of a unit as a class or function. These tests are written in an isolated fashion. I mean, if the rest of the system is full of bugs and nothing else work, if this unit work, the test will pass. They are also repeatable. They don't depend on anything else, really. Anytime you run the test, if the code hasn't changed, the test will report the same result. These tests are intimately related to the code quality of your project. If your code is clean, these tests should be relatively easy to write. When writing unit tests in iOS, you usually use XCTest or Quick
- Quick – behavior-driven development framework for Swift and Objective-C
What are some alternatives?
Nimble - A Matcher Framework for Swift and Objective-C
OHHTTPStubs - Stub your network requests easily! Test your apps with fake network data and custom response time, response code and headers!
SwiftCheck - QuickCheck for Swift
Mockingbird - A Swifty mocking framework for Swift and Objective-C.
CatchingFire - Test Library for Swift's Error Handling
Kiwi - Simple BDD for iOS
Spry - A Mac and iOS Playgrounds Unit Testing library based on Nimble.
SwiftyMocky - Framework for automatic mock generation. Adds a set of handy methods, simplifying testing. One of the best and most complete solutions, including generics support and much more.
Sleipnir - BDD-style framework for Swift