swift-corelibs-xctest
The XCTest Project, A Swift core library for providing unit test support (by swiftlang)
Quick
The Swift (and Objective-C) testing framework. (by Quick)
| swift-corelibs-xctest | Quick | |
|---|---|---|
| - | 4 | |
| 1,163 | 9,837 | |
| 0.1% | 0.1% | |
| 3.6 | 5.5 | |
| 5 days ago | 8 days ago | |
| Swift | Swift | |
| Apache License 2.0 | Apache License 2.0 |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
swift-corelibs-xctest
Posts with mentions or reviews of swift-corelibs-xctest.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects.
We haven't tracked posts mentioning swift-corelibs-xctest yet.
Tracking mentions began in Dec 2020.
Quick
Posts with mentions or reviews of Quick.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2025-05-09.
-
What's New in Swift 6.2?
We [have this](https://github.com/Quick/Quick) — and while this framework is still a reasonable choice of a testing framework, I personally feel like the new Swift Testing framework is much nicer to write my test cases with.
-
GitHub can't be trusted. Or, how suspending Russian accounts deleted project history and pull requests
Take this example mentioned in the blog post. It was merged into Quick:main from younata:fix_parallel_tests - until the PR was merged, the code resided in the user younata's profile. That's the point of PRs, right? It can't be merged into Quick unless it passes review and is merged. Therefore, when the (allegedly) Russian user's profile was removed it removed all of the commits on their profile - including anything un-merged. Anything already merged, and thus merged to the Quick project repository, has not been changed.
-
Mobile e2e tests using WebdriverIO and Appium
These tests are responsible for validating that a single unit is working properly. You can think of a unit as a class or function. These tests are written in an isolated fashion. I mean, if the rest of the system is full of bugs and nothing else work, if this unit work, the test will pass. They are also repeatable. They don't depend on anything else, really. Anytime you run the test, if the code hasn't changed, the test will report the same result. These tests are intimately related to the code quality of your project. If your code is clean, these tests should be relatively easy to write. When writing unit tests in iOS, you usually use XCTest or Quick
- Quick – behavior-driven development framework for Swift and Objective-C
What are some alternatives?
When comparing swift-corelibs-xctest and Quick you can also consider the following projects:
Nimble - A Matcher Framework for Swift and Objective-C
OHHTTPStubs - Stub your network requests easily! Test your apps with fake network data and custom response time, response code and headers!
SwiftCheck - QuickCheck for Swift
Sleipnir - BDD-style framework for Swift