Quick Alternatives

Quick reviews and mentions

• GitHub can't be trusted. Or, how suspending Russian accounts deleted project history and pull requests
  1 project | /r/coding | 20 Apr 2022

  Take this example mentioned in the blog post. It was merged into Quick:main from younata:fix_parallel_tests - until the PR was merged, the code resided in the user younata's profile. That's the point of PRs, right? It can't be merged into Quick unless it passes review and is merged. Therefore, when the (allegedly) Russian user's profile was removed it removed all of the commits on their profile - including anything un-merged. Anything already merged, and thus merged to the Quick project repository, has not been changed.

• Mobile e2e tests using WebdriverIO and Appium
  5 projects | dev.to | 28 Feb 2021

  These tests are responsible for validating that a single unit is working properly. You can think of a unit as a class or function. These tests are written in an isolated fashion. I mean, if the rest of the system is full of bugs and nothing else work, if this unit work, the test will pass. They are also repeatable. They don't depend on anything else, really. Anytime you run the test, if the code hasn't changed, the test will report the same result. These tests are intimately related to the code quality of your project. If your code is clean, these tests should be relatively easy to write. When writing unit tests in iOS, you usually use XCTest or Quick

• Quick – behavior-driven development framework for Swift and Objective-C
  1 project | news.ycombinator.com | 16 Jan 2021
• A note from our sponsor - SaaSHub
  www.saashub.com | 12 Oct 2024

  SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives Learn more →