svd2nim VS Nim

Nim's maintainer agrees with you I believe, and the API is as you suggest (volatileLoad and volatileStore): https://nim-lang.org/docs/volatile.html

However, under the hood, Nim compiles to C. So these are macros that typecast to volatile, does the read (or write), then casts back to non-volatile.

(Small plug for my nim project that is somewhat related to OP: https://github.com/EmbeddedNim/svd2nim)

C++ has decent industry acceptance in embedded nowadays, or at least that has been my impression.

After C++, rust is likely the most popular, quite a lot of effort has been put into running rust on embedded, see eg https://github.com/rust-embedded. However, once again to my understanding, industry acceptance is still highly marginal.

After that, there's a bunch of toy-ish efforts to run other languages. Zig, nim, python and javascript variants, etc. Usually anything that has C ABI compatibility should be possible to get up and running (without writing a compiler backend from scratch). I've had fun with some toy projects using nim for ARM cortex-M targets (https://github.com/EmbeddedNim/svd2nim, https://github.com/auxym/nim-on-samd21, https://github.com/EmbeddedNim/picostdlib).

Using Nim (and eg svd2nim to generate the equivalent of CMSIS headers for register access in pure nim), it would be entirely possible to write even the low level stuff (SPI drivers and whatnot) in 100% nim, with the same performance as C and better safety (better static type system and compile-time checks, etc). Runtime (eg overflow) checks and garbage collection are available (at the cost of some performance) but optional. See eg. a pretty basic higher-level API for GPIO access, that provides native performance, since the abstraction is implemented as macros (compile-time abstraction): https://github.com/auxym/nim-on-samd21/blob/master/src/port....

Any chance your MCU is ARM? If so check out my project to generate the register mappings from CMSIS SVD files: https://github.com/EmbeddedNim/svd2nim

To be clear: Ratel isn't my project, just something I'm following due to interest.

In the interest of shameless self promotion :), my own experimentations are :

https://github.com/EmbeddedNim/svd2nim

https://github.com/auxym/nim-on-samd21

And I've used and contributed to picostdlib (https://github.com/beef331/picostdlib), the rp2040 support library.

All just as a hobby, but it's interesting to learn that some companies are actually looking into Nim for firmware! Embedded seems like such a slow moving industry. I believe the author of Nesper and Nephyr also developed them for professional work.

Many vendors provide svd files which describe the hardware registers. It's possible to convert the svd automatically like they do for C. Here's an example for Nim [1]. Rust has one as well.

Though I agree that MCU's currently involve a lot of busy work. It's why I'm working on building a nice system building on Zephyr using Nim [2]. It's pretty great to write a few dozen lines of concise memory safe code to do somethinguseful, and then be able to run it on dozens different MCUs.

It'd be great if there was more Ada core in these systems, as Zephyr is all built in C. At least it's modern clean C and well tested.

1: https://github.com/EmbeddedNim/svd2nim

If you're curious, I have this in MVP status at the moment: https://github.com/auxym/svd2nim

22. Nim - $80,000

I think the right answer to your question would be NimLang[0]. In reality, if you're seeking to use this in any enterprise context, you'd most likely want to select the subset of C++ that makes sense for you or just use C#.

[0]https://nim-lang.org/

I don't think it's a rust-inspired language, but since it has strong typing and compiles to javascript, did you give a look at nim [0] ?

For what it takes, I find the language very expressive without the verbosity in rust that reminds me java. And it is also very flexible.

[0] : https://nim-lang.org/

I see a valid cert for https://nim-lang.org/

FYI, on the front page, https://nim-lang.org, in large type you have this:

> Nim is a statically typed compiled systems programming language. It combines successful concepts from mature languages like Python, Ada and Modula.

You better off with using a compiled language.

If you interested in a language that's compiled, fast, but as easy and pleasant as Python - I'd recommend you take a look at [Nim](https://nim-lang.org).

And to prove what Nim's capable of - here's a cool repo with 100+ cli apps someone wrote in Nim: [c-blake/bu](https://github.com/c-blake/bu)

Chapel has at least several full-time developers at Cray/HPE and (I think) the US national labs, and has had some for almost two decades. That's much more than $100k.

Chapel is also just one of many other projects broadly interested in developing new programming languages for "high performance" programming. Out of that large field, Chapel is not especially related to the specific ideas or design goals of Mojo. Much more related are things like Codon (https://exaloop.io), and the metaprogramming models in Terra (https://terralang.org), Nim (https://nim-lang.org), and Zig (https://ziglang.org).

But Chapel is great! It has a lot of good ideas, especially for distributed-memory programming, which is its historical focus. It is more related to Legion (https://legion.stanford.edu, https://regent-lang.org), parallel & distributed Fortran, ZPL, etc.