surrogate-models
BayesianOptimization
surrogate-models | BayesianOptimization | |
---|---|---|
1 | 5 | |
0 | 7,535 | |
- | 1.7% | |
0.0 | 5.5 | |
about 3 years ago | 23 days ago | |
Python | Python | |
MIT License | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
surrogate-models
-
Gradient-Free-Optimizers A collection of modern optimization methods in Python
Yes it is quite easy to switch algorithms via the "gpr" parameter. You just have to write a wrapper class. I am currently working on a repository that discusses how to do that in detail: https://github.com/SimonBlanke/surrogate-models
BayesianOptimization
-
How best to compress a list of objective function evaluations in numerical optimization?
Yes but that’s a pretty broad label- is there a specific implementation you’re working with (for example ) that pinpoints the memory overhead you want to shrink?
- It's so fun and useful to me
-
[P] Bonsai: Bayesian Optimization for Gradient Boosted Trees
Sure, I’m only aware of the Bayesian Optimization package (https://github.com/fmfn/BayesianOptimization), but if you can recommend some other GP-based methods that integrate well with Gradient boosted machines, that would be nice.
-
How to optimize multiple variables to minimize the output?
I've previously used Bayesian optimisation for this kind of problem, if you're working in python this is a pretty great starting point (https://github.com/fmfn/BayesianOptimization). Black box optimisation is, to the best of my knowledge, a pretty large field and certainly a very difficult problem. You could certainly do a lot worse than BayesOpt.
-
Gradient-Free-Optimizers A collection of modern optimization methods in Python
This looks super interesting, I have previously considered using the Bayesian Optimization[0] package for some work, but the ability to switch out the underlying algorithms is appealing.
Perhaps a bit of a far out question - I would be interested in using this for optimizing real-world (ie slow, expensive, noisy) processes. A caveat with this is that the work is done in batches (eg N experiments at a time). Is there a mechanism by which I could feed in my results from previous rounds and have the algorithm suggest the next N configurations that are sufficiently uncorrelated to explore promising space without bunching on top of each-other? My immediate read is that I could use the package to pick the next optimal point, but would then have to lean on a random search for the remainder of the batch?
0: https://github.com/fmfn/BayesianOptimization
What are some alternatives?
Gradient-Free-Optimizers - Simple and reliable optimization with local, global, population-based and sequential techniques in numerical discrete search spaces.
opytimizer - 🐦 Opytimizer is a Python library consisting of meta-heuristic optimization algorithms.
Hyperactive - An optimization and data collection toolbox for convenient and fast prototyping of computationally expensive models.
nhentai-favorites-auto-pagination - This is an infinity randomly picker doujinshi from yours favorite list with auto scroll and pagination
optimization-tutorial - Tutorials for the optimization techniques used in Gradient-Free-Optimizers and Hyperactive.
ix - Simple dotfile pre-processor with a per-file configuration and no dependencies.
pybobyqa - Python-based Derivative-Free Optimization with Bound Constraints
Bayesian-Optimization-in-FSharp - Bayesian Optimization via Gaussian Processes in F#