stylegan2-pytorch VS Frontpage

export default function ChannelListBottomBar(): JSX.Element { const { client } = useChatContext(); const [micActive, setMicActive] = useState(false); const [audioActive, setAudioActive] = useState(false); return (

{client.user?.image && (

div> )}

{client.user?.name} span> {client.user?.online ? 'Online' : 'Offline'} span> p> button>

setMicActive((currentValue) => !currentValue)} > button> setAudioActive((currentValue) => !currentValue)} > button> button> div> ); }

I wonder if we will ever get a realism model which can produce normal faces like https://thispersondoesnotexist.com instead of like super symmetrical faces of models

this has been in circulation since a while AI images took off, and they certainly weren't convincing before they did. You know the old "try to name one thing in this image" macro? Pretty sure that was AI generated, there was also thispersondoesnotexist.com which was always pretty good but of course it is

Not the workflow for these images, but if you easily want to spice up your gens with a bit more natural look, try using images from thispersondoesnotexist.com with IPAdapter face model.

...then they just use the app on generated images of not real people (potentially based on specific inputs to remind you of a real person).

Also we can generate very realistic faces with AI, https://thispersondoesnotexist.com/ (old example), fully 3D faces are doable at this point. So in another 5-10 years a low profile model like him wouldn't even be hired for this, they would just generate a digital face model. Unionizing will only speed up studios adoption of digital replacements.

It looks like they all use a profile picture made with https://thispersondoesnotexist.com/

Through the Fast Forward program, we give free services and support to open source projects and the nonprofits that support them. We support many of the world’s top programming languages (like Python, Rust, Ruby, and the wonderful Scratch), foundational technologies (cURL, the Linux kernel, Kubernetes, OpenStreetMap), and projects that make the internet better and more fun for everyone (Inkscape, Mastodon, Electronic Frontier Foundation, Terms of Service; Didn’t Read).

Terms of service are generally pretty shitty, yes. But this is egregiously shitty.

https://tosdr.org/ is a good site to compare. Any service over Grade E (Spotify, Facebook, the usual suspects) is (very likely to be) less bad. DeviantArt for example is a D, and doesn't include waiving your moral rights among some of the other overreach.

Some service terms are actually quite good (DuckDuckGo, Mullvad, off the top of my head). Though these aren't content sharing platforms so it's not really as fair of a comparison.

This is super useful https://tosdr.org/

> Meaningful consent is becoming increasingly difficult for consumers; for instance ...

https://tosdr.org is good for that, why don't Mozilla just contribute to an existing project

I can't give you a complete guide here, but I recommend you go to privacy subreddits or watch relevant Youtube videos for more info. I also recommend sites like privacytools.io and privacyguides.org They contain lists of alternatives and tools. Also check out tosdr.org which contains summaries of the TOS of a ton of sites. Also try email aliases like simplelogin or anonaddy. Use burner emails for throwaways if possible emailnator.com or tempail.com . Try to use as many open-source applications as possible. You can even self-host certain things.

I think what you're looking for is TOSDR (Terms of Service, Didn't Read): https://tosdr.org

It's been going for several years and has very thorough analysis of various ToS, done by volunteers who are often legal professionals.