static-frame VS pdbpp

This is inadequate, as it ignores the types contained within the container. A DataFrame might have string column labels and three columns of integer, string, and floating-point values; these characteristics define the type. A function argument with such type hints provides developers, static analyzers, and runtime checkers with all the information needed to understand the expectations of the interface. StaticFrame 2 now permits this:

StaticFrame is an alternative DataFrame library that offers efficient solutions to this problem, both for in-memory and disk-based memoization.

A NumPy array is a Python object that stores data in a contiguous C-array buffer. The excellent performance of these arrays comes not only from this compact representation, but also from the ability of arrays to share "views" of that buffer among many arrays. NumPy makes frequent use of "no-copy" array operations, producing derived arrays without copying underling data buffers. By taking full advantage of NumPy's efficiency, the StaticFrame DataFrame library offers orders-of-magnitude better performance than Pandas for many common operations.

static-frame. An immutable alternative to pandas.

StaticFrame is an immutable DataFrame library that offers solutions to such problems. In StaticFrame, alternative fill value representations can be used to preserve columnar types in reindexing, shifting, and many other operations that require fill_value arguments. For operations on heterogeneously typed columnar data, one fill value is simply not enough.

For me, one example of high cpu usage is when i visit links like this one (https://github.com/InvestmentSystems/static-frame/blob/master/static_frame/performance/core.py) on GitHub. Safari is extremely laggy when i do nothing more than just scrolling around. Do you have sth like this?

Why not just use Python’s built-in pdb debugger or another existing one like ipdb or pdbpp?

I like pdbpp. Make sure to install from source as there hasn’t been a release in a while.

https://github.com/pdbpp/pdbpp

pdbpp: Improved pdb boltons: assorted python addtions twisted: event driven networking framework sorcery: Dark magic in python, things know where+how they are being called, helps reducing boilerplate sh: Better alternative for subprocess module, much more pythonic taskipy: npm run scipt_name like functionality snoop: pdb lite, record+replay function steps birdseye: graphical debugger remote-pdb: easy pdb from inside containers typer: wrapper around click for simpler code for CLIs arrow: Always TZ aware datetimes, plus more features more-itertools: more functions for iterators pydantic: data validation + dataclasses loguru: better logging notifiers: sending notifications from python

If you want to use pdbpp, install it into your Python environment you're using the debugger from and it'll automatically hook itself into pdb with no additional setup.

I love pdbpp

pdbpp feels like getting super powers over using pdb

Most of the tools and libraries I use have been mentioned, but I haven’t seen pdb++ brought up. It’s like ipython for debugging!

Improved version of built-in debugger: https://github.com/pdbpp/pdbpp

I like to use PDB++ which is a drop in replacement for PDB

https://github.com/pdbpp/pdbpp