stacks-core VS solana

下载地址：https://github.com/stacks-network/stacks-blockchain/releases

There are no plans for Bitcoin to stop being the anchor chain. Original plans included a sunset for PoX, but that is something the community will decide on, seems like that date will be extended by a lot or eliminated entirely. SIPs and discussions are around that get into this in detail. Ex. https://github.com/blockstack/stacks-blockchain/issues/2613

For details of the technical upgrade, please refer here.

Serendipity has occurred. At the launch of Stacks 2.0, the intent was for 2.1 to automatically go live at Bitcoin block 700,000. However, due to a bug this is not going to happen — the Stacks 2.0 chain will continue indefinitely(see#2507). But, we see this as blessing in disguise. We are strong believers in multi-stakeholder blockchain governance, and we believe that Stackers and miners should also have a say in when and how breaking changes occur — it shouldn’t be just the decision of developers. Therefore, we are going to take this opportunity to make sure that when the 2.1 upgrade is ready, it will only activate with the consent of the network.

Miners are also still in the process of adopting some recent node updates that will help them more reliably prioritize transactions with higher fees. Once those have been adopted thoroughly, this new wallet version should help transactions settle even more reliably.

here’s their github, don’t know exactly where in there the sortition is coded: https://github.com/blockstack/stacks-blockchain

That's the current plan. There's an open issue about whether or not to push it back, make it so users can vote to extend it, or just make it so that STX holders can police miners and make sure they don't discount-mine: https://github.com/blockstack/stacks-blockchain/issues/2613

Solana (9700 GitHub Stars) https://github.com/solana-labs/solana

EIP Core standards: Changes to Solana’s core code go through “feature gates” in the Solana repo. Yes, it’s much less organized than the EIP pages you are used to, and a headache to understand or keep up with. A cost of the speed of development, I’m told.

I visited the project on github (https://github.com/solana-labs/solana), and tried to get an overview of the ~800 open issues and ~100 open PRs.

Solana

With the introduction of new and advanced blockchain platforms in the Web 3.0 scene, the narrative around Ethereum has slowly shifted towards its younger “Ethereum Alternatives”. Solana, Avalanche, and MultiversX (former Elrond) are some of the crypto blockchains that are given this terminology, as they share similar features but are comparatively cheaper and better than Ethereum.

I understand this initiative is connected with Solana network [1] in some way?

[1] https://solana.com/

They do, actually: https://github.com/solana-labs/solana/security/policy

Not sure I understand your question, but if you want the source code you can find it on github (https://github.com/solana-labs/solana)

Some topics that may be discussed in the next call include @ShinobiSystems Timely Vote Credits proposal (https://github.com/solana-labs/solana/blob/master/docs/src/proposals/timely-vote-credits.md), @elusivprivacy new built-in cryptographic operations to accelerate ZK verification (for privacy tech), and feature activation coordination standards.