stable_diffusion.openvino VS Pytorch

it might be the --xformers flag, try getting rid of that since your not using cuda you wouldn't be able to run it with xformers and you could also try --use-cpu all ... you can also check this out .. https://github.com/bes-dev/stable_diffusion.openvino .. it's probably your best option if your using CPU, which if your PC Graphics are using Intel UHD 620 then you don't have a GPU and an optimized CPU inference would be best to run

SD can be run on a CPU without a GPU. I know for certain it can be done with OpenVINO. In fact, on some i7s, it will run at around 3 seconds per iteration. There was a reddit SD thread a while back saying it can be done with Automatic111. Also, soe recent threads on problems with AMD GPUs suggest Automatic1111 is using the CPU rather than the intended GPU. (Fortuanely, I have a GPU, so I don't have to deal with it myself!)

I'm not actually entirely convinced that it's even using the GPU. Radeontop shows 0% utilization while the images are generating. Additionally, the listed iteration speed should be impossibly slow for any GPU; it says 26.58s/it, which is slower than just running on a CPU.

iGPU's are in short not supported. There's this repo that may or may not help you, but even if it did I wouldn't expect much.

You can also run it in windows native with openvino, there is a barebones webui for it as well in one of the forks.Requires setting cpu to gpu in one the files. https://github.com/bes-dev/stable_diffusion.openvino

In https://github.com/bes-dev/stable_diffusion.openvino/blob/master/stable_diffusion_engine.py

" We ended up using three different Stable Diffusion projects for our testing, mostly because no single package worked on every GPU. For Nvidia, we opted for Automatic 1111's webui version(opens in new tab). AMD GPUs were tested using Nod.ai's Shark version(opens in new tab), while for Intel's Arc GPUs we used Stable Diffusion OpenVINO(opens in new tab). "

torch is a package to manage tensors and dynamic neural networks in python (GitHub)

PyTorch also has some support for them, but it's quite incomplete and has many issues so that it is basically unusable. And its future development is also unclear. https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/60832

TensorFlow

TensorFlow, developed by Google, and PyTorch, developed by Facebook, are two of the most popular frameworks for building and training complex machine learning models. TensorFlow is known for its flexibility and robust scalability, making it suitable for both research prototypes and production deployments. PyTorch is praised for its ease of use, simplicity, and dynamic computational graph that allows for more intuitive coding of complex AI models. Both frameworks support a wide range of AI models, from simple linear regression to complex deep neural networks.

> does PyTorch have a similar concept

of course https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/blob/main/torch/utils/_py...

fyi should work on most 40xx[1]

[1] https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/119638#issuecommen...

Sure, right here: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/blob/main/torch/autograd/...

Here's the documentation: https://pytorch.org/tutorials/intermediate/forward_ad_usage....

> When an input, which we call “primal”, is associated with a “direction” tensor, which we call “tangent”, the resultant new tensor object is called a “dual tensor” for its connection to dual numbers[0].

*My post explains Dot, Matrix and Element-wise multiplication in PyTorch.

In PyTorch with @, dot() or matmul():

import torch # we use PyTorch: https://pytorch.org data = torch.tensor(encode(text), dtype=torch.long) print(data.shape, data.dtype) print(data[:1000]) # the 1000 characters we looked at earlier will to the GPT look like this