stable-diffusion-webui-pixelization VS sd-webui-pixelart

Pixelization extension is ok. It uses several models to produce a pixelated image. But sometimes it gives strange results, and i have no control over color palette, dithering, and quantization. It's a good, quick solution.

Astropulse makes a good model but it's paid. You can get good results using Pixhell from CivitAI and running it through the pixelation filter. https://github.com/AUTOMATIC1111/stable-diffusion-webui-pixelization.git

You might be interested in the pixelization extension for the auto webui: https://github.com/AUTOMATIC1111/stable-diffusion-webui-pixelization

:) my apologies , still getting used to Reddit here :D , i was saying there to use pixelart extention with Automatic1111 this one: https://github.com/AUTOMATIC1111/stable-diffusion-webui-pixelization this way the result you generate gives you overall "feel and look of a pixelart" and with this extension you can pre-define how big the pixels are and so on depending on your needs. This way you can get the style of an image you're going for, and then apply the proper 8bit pixelization on it :) hope that helps.

So... I created one more extension: sd-webui-pixelart