sst-start-demo VS terraform

https://docs.serverless-stack.com and https://www.serverless.com/ can support next. However serverless-stack is too new and serverless framework looks promising but it uses an old version of serverless plugin.

I'm new to serverless and I've recently discovered frameworks like the Serverless Framework and SST. I've seen examples of Lambda functions where people interact with DBs like DynamoDB, authenticating users with Cognito and using API Gateway to map routes (these are all AWS-specific terms), which seems to me like you can pretty much build a CRUD API on top of this. However, I've also seen examples like this one where you can deploy a backend framework such as Nest.js as a single lambda function.

Hey all, recently I've been learning a lot about serverless APIs and I discovered frameworks like Serverless and SST which look great. I then also discovered that you can apparently deploy a Nest.js backend as a lambda handler -- here is a relevant article. Has anyone tried this? If you are looking to start working on a new project, is it a good idea to combine these together, or would you be better off just writing individual lambda handlers without a framework like Nest?

Hosting NextJS apps on AWS I would recommend https://docs.serverless-stack.com/ which has an inbuilt CDK pre-configured NextJS setup or https://registry.terraform.io/modules/dealmore/next-js/aws/latest

I highly recommend serverless SST. https://docs.serverless-stack.com/

> The ability to move between the frontend, backend, and infrastructure code without having to learn a different language is invaluable to every member of the team.

I'm actually quite skeptical of this claim. Learning a new language isn't really a big deal unless you are using relatively "esoteric" stuff like clojure or elixir which really require an experienced consultant to train your team.

With AWS Chalice, we've been able to ship production scale code (for govcloud) in Python without any one of us breaking the environment by simply using separate staging. We were able to get PHP/Javascript developers to use it with barely any downtime. In fact it was more or less appreciated from the clean and simple nature of Python right from the get go.

This feels like way too much engineering from the get go. Here's my workflow with AWS Chalice and its super basic (I'm open to improvements here).

- checkout code from github

- run localhost and test endpoints written in python (exactly like Flask)

- push to development stage API gateway

- verify it is working as intended and this is when we catch missing IAM roles, we document them. if something is wrong with our AWS setup (we dont use CDK just simply use the AWS console to set everything up once like VPC and RDS)

- push to production stage API gateway

All this shimming, typescript (rule of thumb is ~40% more code for 20% improvement through less documentation and type errors, only really valid in large teams) separate AWS developer accounts seems overkill.

The one benefit I see from all this extra compartmentalization is if you are working in large teams for a large company since you are going to discover missing IAM roles and permissions anyways and is part of being an implicit "human AWS compiler trying different stackoverflow answers".

Some positives I see are CDK but if you are deploying your infrastructure once, I really don't see the need for it, unless you have many infrastructures that can benefit from boilerplate generation.

Happy to hear from all ends of the spectrum, serverless-stack could be something I explore this weekend but there's just so much going on and I'm getting lot of marketing department vibes from reading the website (like idea to ipo and typescript for all) and to top it off

going to https://docs.serverless-stack.com/ triggers an antivirus warning about some netlify url ( nostalgic-brahmgupta09582d1.netlify.app) what is going on here???

documentation which is top notch

On a related note, shout out to https://docs.serverless-stack.com/ which is kinda like Serverless Framework except build on the CDK. Much more solid IMHO

ServerlessStack framework

State Encryption was one of those long requested features[0] (I had it on my ideas list for years[1]) that Hashicorp didn't have much incentive to build. I don't think it has to with distancing opentofu as such, but the opentofu team prioritizing the right things that customers actually need.

[0]: https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform/issues/9556

[1]: https://github.com/captn3m0/ideas#-mars-terraform-remote-htt...

https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform/issues/34402

I’m not a lawyer and have no idea who is right or wrong but I understand why Hashicorp is scrutinizing this.

Just to give an example of the power of Go for CLI builds, you may have already used or at least heard of Docker, Kubernetes, Prometheus, Terraform, but what do they all have in common? They all have a large part of their usability via CLI and are developed in Go 🐿.

Each app’s front end is built with Qwik and uses Tailwind for styling. The server-side is powered by Qwik City (Qwik’s official meta-framework) and runs on Node.js hosted on a shared Linode VPS. The apps also use PM2 for process management and Caddy as a reverse proxy and SSL provisioner. The data is stored in a PostgreSQL database that also runs on a shared Linode VPS. The apps interact with the database using Drizzle, an Object-Relational Mapper (ORM) for JavaScript. The entire infrastructure for both apps is managed with Terraform using the Terraform Linode provider, which was new to me, but made provisioning and destroying infrastructure really fast and easy (once I learned how it all worked).

For example, integrating Terraform for infrastructure as code (IaC) into the IDP can streamline updates and rollbacks.

In this project, you will understand and get hands on experience around the entire concept around CI/CD from applications perspective. To fully gain real expertise around this idea, it is best to see it in action across different programming languages and from the platform perspective too. From the application perspective, we will be focusing on PHP here; there are more projects ahead that are based on Java, Node.js, .Net and Python. By the time you start working on Terraform, Docker and Kubernetes projects, you will get to see the platform perspective of CI/CD in action.

Infrastructure as Code (IaC) is an important part of any true hosting operation in the public cloud. Each of these platforms has their own IaC solution, e.g. AWS CloudFormation. But they also support popular open-source IaC tools like Pulumi or Terraform. A category of tools that also needs to be discussed is API gateways and other app-specific load balancers. There are applications for internal consumption, which can be called microservices if you have a lot of them. And often microservices use advanced networking options such as a service mesh instead of just the native private network offered by a VPC.

To quickly deploy the architecture, we will be using Terraform. With Terraform, we can automate the deployment process and have our infrastructure up and running in minutes.