sslyze
bettercap
sslyze | bettercap | |
---|---|---|
10 | 28 | |
3,144 | 15,709 | |
- | 0.9% | |
7.5 | 1.0 | |
4 days ago | 26 days ago | |
Python | Go | |
GNU Affero General Public License v3.0 | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
sslyze
- Tool to check whether 0-RTT is enabled or not
- SSL Diag Tool
-
Ways to test SSL Certificates
For Internally and Externally accessible websites – Can use hostname or IP address Sslyze command line tool - https://github.com/nabla-c0d3/sslyze/releases - current version is 4.1.0
- SSL / TLS scanning utility (internal) ?
-
ERR_SSL_VERSION_OR_CIPHER_MISMATCH
3) If you are technically skilled then there are programs/scripts you can run that will tell you exactly what TLS/SSL settings your router supports by scanning it. I have used https://github.com/nabla-c0d3/sslyze in the past but that was a long time ago so not sure it still works well
- the "best" ciphers
-
sslyze VS cryptolyzer - a user suggested alternative
2 projects | 24 Jan 2022
-
CryptoLyzer: A comprehensive cryptographic settings analyzer
There are many notable open-source projects (SSLyze, CipherScan, testssl.sh, tls-scan, …) and several SaaS solutions (CryptCheck, CypherCraft, Hardenize, ImmuniWeb, Mozilla Observatory, SSL Labs, …) to do a security setting analysis, especially when we are talking about TLS, which is the most common and popular cryptographic protocol. However, most of these tools heavily depend on one or more versions of one or more cryptographic protocol libraries, like GnuTLS, OpenSSL, or wolfSSL. But why is this such a problem?
- Create a tool to capture the TLS handshake and cipher suite being used
-
Awesome Penetration Testing
SSLyze - Fast and comprehensive TLS/SSL configuration analyzer to help identify security mis-configurations.
bettercap
-
bettercap VS petep - a user suggested alternative
2 projects | 3 Oct 2023
-
Malware installed in this bluetooth remote?
you can do this with Bettercap
- bettercap hell
-
quicklisp security (or total lack of it)
I've been learning some common lisp, reading through Practical Common Lisp, and it's really neat. People say the good ideas of lisp got adapted in other languages and sure that's true of garbage collection, lambda's and some others, but I'm seeing plenty incredible stuff I haven't seen elsewhere, the condition system that among other things lets you fix and resume your program on exception, real interactive development, flexible object system, macros way more understandable than in other languages with AST macros as in lisp the AST is simple, an expressive dynamic language at high level of ruby and python while being an order of magnitude faster performance. Quicklisp also is really neat, how many other package managers can load new dependencies without restarting your application? And I was learning it with idea that it's not just of historical or hobby interest but legitimately a good choice I can use for new programming projects today for many tasks, but I just learned something that makes it impossible for me to consider, which is complete lack of security of quicklisp. You go to the website and see sha256 hash and PGP signature for quicklisp download, awesome it seems at the security standard you expect for a package manager. But then the actual quicklisp client does all downloads over http with no verification. What this means in practical terms is basically if you use quicklisp, anyone on your local network can easily hack your computer, by MITM (man-in-the-middle) the traffic and serving you backdoored software when you install packages from quicklisp. mitm6 will MITM windows machines on normal networks, bettercap can MITM linux and os x on most networks. Aside from attackers on your local network there's plenty other scenarios, you can go near office of CL using company and set up a open WIFI access point with same name as company wifi and hack their developers, using quicklisp over something like Tor is extremely dangerous at present as it would let the exit node backdoor the packages you download, and then in less likely but still should be protected against scenarios is just if quicklisp.org or any router between you and it is compromised, you can be hacked.
- Grannar från helvetet
- Bettercap – Swiss Army Knife for 802.11, BLE, IPv4 and IPv6 Networks
-
Hacker News top posts: Dec 3, 2022
Bettercap – Swiss Army Knife for 802.11, BLE, IPv4 and IPv6 Networks\ (5 comments)
What are some alternatives?
sslscan - sslscan tests SSL/TLS enabled services to discover supported cipher suites
aircrack-ng - WiFi security auditing tools suite
RustScan - 🤖 The Modern Port Scanner 🤖
MITMf - Framework for Man-In-The-Middle attacks
aioquic - QUIC and HTTP/3 implementation in Python
mitmproxy - An interactive TLS-capable intercepting HTTP proxy for penetration testers and software developers.
tls-scan - An Internet scale, blazing fast SSL/TLS scanner ( non-blocking, event-driven )
wifipumpkin3 - Powerful framework for rogue access point attack.
scapy - Scapy: the Python-based interactive packet manipulation program & library. Supports Python 2 & Python 3.
pwnagotchi-display-password-plugin - Pwnagotchi plugin to display the most recently cracked password on the Pwnagotchi face
simpleeval - Simple Safe Sandboxed Extensible Expression Evaluator for Python
Metasploit - Metasploit Framework