sqlmodel VS gradio

Seems like this is a known bug in SQLModel: https://github.com/tiangolo/sqlmodel/issues/10

I have not used it myself but the creator of fastapi has made https://github.com/tiangolo/sqlmodel

I have already posted this question in Stack Overflow and GitHub and have been ignored in both 😢. You guys are my last hope.

I had a requirement to process and validate large payloads of JSON concurrently for a web service, initially I implemented it using jsonschema and fastjsonschema but I found the whole JSON Schema Specification to be confusing at times and on top of that wanted better performance. Albeit there are ways to compile/cache the schema, I wanted to move away from the schema specification so I wrote a validation library inspired by the design of tiangolo/sqlmodel (type hints) to solve this problem easier.

Github Repository

I would say as long as your current solution works and is easy to maintain keep it. If you want to switch I would recommend FastAPI, it is new(ish), but definitely old enough to have been tested and used in a large variety of production usecases. In your case it might be interesting to have a look at SQLModel (works with FastAPI, same author), especially if the API endpoints match closely to the database objects. https://github.com/tiangolo/sqlmodel

SQLModel.

Sounds similar to https://github.com/tiangolo/sqlmodel

There was a lot of hype and excitement around the release of SQLModel, a Pydantic + SQLAlchemy hybrid Model library with native integration for FastAPI. I pulled it out just now and there hasn't been any update beyond the initial anouncment on August 25th.

gradio is a package developed to ease the development of app interfaces in python and other languages (GitHub)

There's also that library all the AI models started using that gives you a public URL to share. After researching it: https://www.gradio.app/ is the link.

It's used specifically for making simple UIs for machine learning apps. But I guess technically you could use it for anything.

What is the business model for https://www.taipy.io/, https://streamlit.io/, or https://www.gradio.app/? These are nice tools - but how will the sponsoring businesses support themselves? I didn't see any mention of enterprise plans, etc. Is the answer simply that "we've not announced our revenue model yet"? What should one expect?

Repo : https://github.com/gradio-app/gradio

There's TensorFlow.js for running machine learning on JavaScript, but personally, I'd prefer using the Python Gradio package, which is designed for creating UIs for machine learning inference demos.

I found an issue on gradio github but looks like it's closed so I am not sure if it's still a common issue or only I am facing it due to certain settings/absence of a fix. ( https://github.com/gradio-app/gradio/issues/3060 )

I disagree hard with this – for instance I've recently needed to dig into the code for the Gradio library, and when PRs are like https://github.com/gradio-app/gradio/pull/3300 (and the merge commit's message is what it is) it's hard to understand why some decisions have been made when doing `git annotate` later on.

Gradio for a ui that your commanderGPT can visit and use

gradio is documented, it doesn't seem very complex, it would be something like moving this block under the other one. i think it's ui_extra_networks.py, the file you are looking to edit. (if you do it make a copy to restore when you go to update)

Gradio did have an issue for a while where your URL was guessable, so unless you had a password it was pretty easy to find, but as far as I know they've increased the complexity so much that it's no longer an issue.