sqlite-kit VS fluent

Compare sqlite-kit vs fluent and see what are their differences.

Our great sponsors
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
sqlite-kit fluent
1 3
56 1,321
- 1.2%
5.9 6.4
3 months ago about 2 months ago
Swift JavaScript
MIT License Apache License 2.0
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

sqlite-kit

Posts with mentions or reviews of sqlite-kit. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-03-21.

fluent

Posts with mentions or reviews of fluent. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-10-30.
  • Fluent: A localization system for natural-sounding translations
    1 project | news.ycombinator.com | 26 Apr 2024
  • Use YouTube to improve your English pronunciation
    3 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 30 Oct 2023
    Tried BoldVoice right now and almost immediately hit a bit of awkwardness: “Tomorrow, we’ll work on Practice your consonant skills”. Usually I wouldn’t complain about this sort of thing, but in a language learning app it seems unfortunate. (Mozilla’s Project Fluent[1] was built to handle these situations in a localization setting, but you can probably get away with something much simpler.)

    [1] https://projectfluent.org/

  • Internationalization best practices for front-end developers
    8 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 11 Aug 2023
    Hi! Thank you for your critique!

    > 1) “Your knight has killed a dragon with a crossbow”

    We have a proposal for dynamic references to address this problem - https://github.com/projectfluent/fluent/issues/80 - it's non-trivial but I hope we'll see it solved in Fluent and/or in MessageFormat 2.

    > 2) The parser is extremely sensitive

    True. It's on purpose. We wanted to start with strict and loosen, rather than the opposite.

    > 3) The input files mandate a weird arrangement of new lines for even the simplest branching

    Same as above.

    > 4) The documentation is too Spartan to know what happens in edge cases.

    We're a small team :)

    > It heralds itself to be the saviour of all i18n, but it’s literally worse than the mess that came before it.

    I'm sorry to hear it doesn't work for you. I'm relieved that your criticism is seems more subjective except of one missing feature that no other l10n system has as of yet.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing sqlite-kit and fluent you can also consider the following projects:

SQLite - A stand-alone Swift wrapper around the SQLite 3 client library.

RVS_Generic_Swift_Toolbox - A Collection Of Various Swift Tools, Like Extensions and Utilities

leaf - 🍃 An expressive, performant, and extensible templating language built for Swift.

go-i18n - Translate your Go program into multiple languages.

Redbird - Vapor provider for RediStack

transloco - 🚀 😍 The internationalization (i18n) library for Angular