spiderfoot VS CyberChef

I’d suggest Spiderfoot.

the most complete and best at present https://www.spiderfoot.net

Spiderfoot is good https://github.com/smicallef/spiderfoot

Have you tried SpiderFoot. Let it run for a day and you will be amazed at the findings! https://www.spiderfoot.net/

https://www.spiderfoot.net/ - open-source reconnaissance tool available for Linux and Windows

Mostly by researching the OSINT sources that other open source project pulls data from e.g amass, spiderfoot, the Harvetser etc

try this tool https://www.spiderfoot.net/

Then we take the encrypted text and use CyberChef to decrypt it.

Let's go to CyberChef and insert our pieces of evidence.

A parameter was changed from '2AMBCgIQBg' to 'CgIIAdgDAQ%3D%3D' which is just the correct base64 encoding they should have been using the entire time.

I don't think this was a hostile action by Google, I think someone just added better input validation for security reasons and it accidently broke the bad requests they were sending.

https://gchq.github.io/CyberChef/#recipe=URL_Decode()From_Ba...

❗This is indeed the flag, but the text is encrypted with Base64. Usually, the presence of padding character "=" indicates that's Base64 type of encoding (but that's only one of the hints). To decrypt it, we can use CyberChef. Copy-paste the text and we either:

It uses a combination of magic bytes (like the `file` command), entropy analysis and character frequency detection to determine whether an output is likely to be of interest to the user.

The file type mechanism is written here[0]. There's a list of all signatures we detect here[1].

[0] https://github.com/gchq/CyberChef/blob/master/src/core/lib/F...

I think this can be deciphered using CyberChef...