ray VS web-frameworks

Similar but not free: https://myray.app

Here is link number 1 - Previous text "Ray"

I hope installing spatie/global-ray (and Ray itself) will be a more pleasant experience.

I'm proud to announce the initial release of the spatie/x-ray package for Ray. The x-ray package provides a command-line utility that finds and displays all calls to ray(), rd(), and other functions from the spatie/ray family of packages. Currently, it only supports PHP projects.

Seems to me you just may have stumbled on a not-ideal PHP gig. The entire Laravel ecosystem is pretty awesome, there are a lot better tools for debugging than xdebug (https://myray.app/), and honestly, the amount of horrific spaghetti JS I've had to navigate is in multiple times worse, and in bigger amounts than any PHP related spaghetti I've had to deal with. But I do agree that for a newcomer it's hard to find good PHP products and tools since the information is so saturated on the internet, the only way you really find good quality things is by following the top guys on Twitter or so.

I am the same, it's the most easy. Very interesting is that in the laravel php world currently an interesting product is gaining momentum: Ray (https://myray.app/)

So basically it's dump with a lot of neat extras and instead of looking at the console of the script, or the website you are printing on you push this to a little desktop application, from every of your languages you are using. Something like log collection for everything on your desktop.

Notably it seems that Fomo is using the raw Swoole Server (https://github.com/fomo-framework/framework/blob/a52b75abbd06c0aa6cb1ec47c4011557bc347532/src/Servers/Http.php#L21) rather than the HTTP-specific server wrapper which is what is used in the Swoole benchmark: https://github.com/the-benchmarker/web-frameworks/blob/master/php/swoole/start.php

As an Experienced Developer (TM), I'd like to authoritatively know whether a given tech stack is "slow" or "fast", measured in requests per seconds. I'd like to find a way to correctly and objectively measure performance, but most performance suites measure a small thing in isolation. For example, The Benchmarker measures the performance of HTTP APIs, but the requests are super simple (GET request that gets a value, POST request that doesn't do anything but return a value, empty GET).

Hi friends. I've opened pull requests for the-benchmarker/web-frameworks and Go HTTP Router Benchmark. Hopefully, they will be merged soon. Here are the benchmark results that I got on my laptop from Julien Schmidt's Go HTTP Router Benchmark. For comparison, I also added Chi, GorillaMux, and HttpRouter.

The benchmark code: https://github.com/the-benchmarker/web-frameworks

And the httpbeast code is here: https://github.com/the-benchmarker/web-frameworks/tree/maste...

Here is a large collection of webserver benchmarks. https://github.com/the-benchmarker/web-frameworks & https://web-frameworks-benchmark.netlify.app/result . You can use nanoexpress (Another webserver package based on uWebsockets.js) as a reference to measure HyperExpress's performance and compare it to other frameworks from various languages. The benchmarks you have linked seems to be inaccurate and outdated. A million requests/second for a single machine is very hard to maintain simply because the network upload/download speed/adapter for any cloud provider instance would not suppor the amount of data being transported. You can notice in the benchmarks on the HyperExpress Github, uWebsockets.js/HyperExpress clock in a 400ms+ average response latency while serving almost 200k requests/second. This is because the network speed of the Vultr instance becomes the bottleneck.

test2

I still surprise why Laravel is ranked as some of the lowest performance: https://github.com/the-benchmarker/web-frameworks