sorbet-typed VS rbs_parser

Compare sorbet-typed vs rbs_parser and see what are their differences.

sorbet-typed

A central repository for sharing type definitions for Ruby gems (by sorbet)

rbs_parser

Ruby RBS parsing and translation to Sorbet RBI (by Shopify)
Our great sponsors
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
sorbet-typed rbs_parser
2 3
379 28
0.3% -
4.0 2.5
about 2 months ago over 1 year ago
Ruby C++
Apache License 2.0 MIT License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

sorbet-typed

Posts with mentions or reviews of sorbet-typed. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-06-09.
  • Why We’re Sticking with Ruby on Rails at GitLab
    5 projects | /r/rails | 9 Jun 2022
    The tooling around "installing" types for third party dependencies (the equivalent of doing "npm install @types/something" is non existent. I had to manually copy over files from https://github.com/sorbet/sorbet-typed, which is so far behind pythons and typescript, where you can just "pip install"/"npm install" the types. Not only that, most third party dependencies don't provide types, so the "coverage" is super incomplete. I had to try and create some third party types myself, bit even that was a challenge because it's so hard to be sure of the entirety of what's going on in a ruby codebase because the language is dynamic.
  • Open-Sourcing the Sorbet (Ruby) VS Code Extension
    8 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 6 Jan 2022
    stdlib rbis are shipped with Sorbet. A limited selection of gem RBIs are available at https://github.com/sorbet/sorbet-typed.

rbs_parser

Posts with mentions or reviews of rbs_parser. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-03-29.
  • Sorbet: Stripe's Type Checker for Ruby
    6 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 29 Mar 2022
    We discovered a bug in `srb init` for Ruby 3.1 recently that a teammate of mine is working on fixing at the moment. It's likely that if you tried again in a few days it'll have been fixed. Sorry about that, totally agree that the out-of-box experience should just work.

    I wrote up an FAQ about the state of Ruby 3 and RBS here:

    https://sorbet.org/docs/faq#when-ruby-3-gets-types-what-will...

    The tl;dr is that RBI files (not RBS files) will probably always be the preferred way to declare types for third party code (because it will always support exactly the same set of features that Sorbet does). We have some people in the community look into teaching Sorbet to read the RBS format, but the existing parsers for RBS files are written in Ruby and are very slow, and there are some ambiguities in the spec that make writing a third party parser that compiles to native code tricky. You can see an attempt to write a fast RBS parser in C++ here[1], but again given that RBI files do everything we need them to right now and we have other features people are asking us for, we haven't prioritized RBS support incredibly highly.

    Sorbet works completely fine without RBS files!

    [1] https://github.com/Shopify/rbs_parser

  • Open-Sourcing the Sorbet (Ruby) VS Code Extension
    8 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 6 Jan 2022
    This article might help clear some things up:

    https://sorbet.org/blog/2020/07/30/ruby-3-rbs-sorbet

    tl;dr:

    - RBS files are what Ruby 3 uses to describe types in separate files

    - RBI files are what Sorbet uses to describe types in separate files

    - Sorbet invented its RBI file syntax before RBS files existed. RBI files use the same syntax for types and signatures as in type annotations that live inside `*.rb` source code with Sorbet.

    - We've been meaning to add support to Sorbet to consume both RBI files and RBS files, but we haven't had a chance to get around to it.

    If someone beat us to it and implemented support for RBS files in Sorbet that would be amazing! Shopify took an early stab at implementing an RBS parser in C++ for performance[1], but I'm not sure what the status of it is today.

    [1] https://github.com/Shopify/rbs_parser

  • Sorbet Compiler: An experimental, ahead-of-time compiler for Ruby
    6 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 30 Jul 2021
    (disclaimer: I work on the Sorbet team)

    I think I understand GP's motivation: RBI files and RBS files are two different formats, and as a user of the language, people tend to want to use the officially blessed solution the language provides.

    In case you weren't aware, parlour[1] is a popular open source project for working with RBI files. I believe it supports transparently converting between RBI files (Sorbet) and RBS files (Ruby 3).

    There is also rbs_parser[2], a C++ parser for RBS files to convert them to RBI files, written by Shopify, a major user of Sorbet.

    Stepping back: I haven't personally read many complaints from Sorbet users describing how the current state of RBI/RBS interop gets in the way of what they can actually do with Sorbet. Almost all the feature requests we get about Sorbet (both inside Stripe and outside) are for fixing bugs or implementing new language-level features. RBI files as implemented seem to work.

    Sorbet already has an extensive set of RBI files covering the Ruby standard library (at least as good or better to my knowledge than any existing repository of types for RBS files), and there are plentiful tools for working with RBI files, listed here.[3]

    If lack of first-party RBS support in Sorbet is holding you back from trying Sorbet, I'd strongly encourage you to give Sorbet a try anyways! Many people have shared great experiences adopting Sorbet in their Ruby codebases.

    [1] https://github.com/AaronC81/parlour

    [2] https://github.com/Shopify/rbs_parser

    [3] https://sorbet.org/en/community

What are some alternatives?

When comparing sorbet-typed and rbs_parser you can also consider the following projects:

dry-struct - Typed struct and value objects

tapioca - The swiss army knife of RBI generation

dry-types - Flexible type system for Ruby with coercions and constraints

sorbet - A fast, powerful type checker designed for Ruby

crystal - The Crystal Programming Language

rspec-sorbet - A small gem consisting of helpers for using Sorbet & RSpec together.

solargraph-rails - Solargraph plugin to add awareness of Rails-specific code

Packagist - Package Repository Website - try https://packagist.com if you need your own -

solargraph - A Ruby language server.

parlour - A type signature generator, merger and parser system for Sorbet and Ruby 3/Steep