sonic VS bayard

Sonic - a project written in Rust, uses custom network communication protocol for fast communication between the client and the server.

This is uncanny, I just discovered ArchiveBox earlier today and set up a self-hosted instance on some home hardware for a collection of bookmarks of useful guides, tutorials, and references I've collected over the years.

Setting it up on K8s with sonic [1] as the search backend and importing a few hundred URLs only took ~an hour or so, and the cached pages look great for the most part.

[1] https://github.com/valeriansaliou/sonic

If you don't need advanced search features, you can use Sonic (https://github.com/valeriansaliou/sonic). It's blazing fast and you can save lot of money on servers.

What about Sonic? Maybe it requires a bit of integration, but it's simple and blazing fast.

git clone https://github.com/valeriansaliou/sonic.git

Somewhat related, this guy: https://github.com/mosuka/ seems to be very passionate about search service.

He built two distributed search services:

- https://github.com/mosuka/phalanx, written in Go.

- https://github.com/mosuka/bayard, written in Rust.

I wish we had an extension like ZomboDB but using a lighter search engine like https://github.com/quickwit-oss/quickwit, https://github.com/toshi-search/Toshi and https://github.com/mosuka/bayard

Here I'm listing engines based on https://github.com/quickwit-oss/tantivy - tantivy is comparable to Lucene in its scope - but I'm sure there are other engines that could tackle ElasticSearch.

Another thing that could happen is maybe directly embed tantivy in Postgres using an extension, perhaps this could be an option too.

So there's more than one? The one I knew was https://github.com/quickwit-oss/tantivy and https://github.com/quickwit-oss/quickwit on top of it (there's a couple of other search engines built on top of tantivy, like https://github.com/bayard-search/bayard)