Async Ruby
Hanami
Async Ruby | Hanami | |
---|---|---|
20 | 22 | |
1,986 | 6,190 | |
1.0% | 0.4% | |
8.0 | 7.8 | |
18 days ago | 3 days ago | |
Ruby | Ruby | |
MIT License | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Async Ruby
-
EventMachine Performance Spikes
The Async gem is the natural successor, It's actively maintained, and allows you write synchronous code is if it wasn't non-blocking, and most libraries don't need any special support for Async (exceptions are gems with C extensions that do I/O and DB libraries with connection pooling that would otherwise be thread-based).
-
Philosophy of Coroutines
https://github.com/socketry/async uses coroutines and I think in general it’s been a great model with very few downsides in practice.
-
Is ruby really slow?
There's async I/O. Here's a library that leans on Ruby 3's fiber scheduler.
-
Show HN: Goru, an experimental, Go-inspired concurrency library for Ruby
Hey folks, wanted to show this off and get feedback. Still early/experimental but there are quite a few concepts I'm excited about here. This project came about while writing a program in Go and loving its approach to concurrency. Being a long-time Rubyist I immediately started to think about what similar concepts might look like in Ruby.
I set out with two main design constraints:
1. Lightweight: I didn't want routines to be backed by fibers or threads. Having been involved some in the async project (https://github.com/socketry/async), I had some experience using fibers for concurrency but was curious if they could be avoided.
2. Explicitness: Routine behavior must be written to describe exactly how it is to behave. I always felt like concurrent code was hard to fully understand because of the indirection involved. On the spectrum between tedium and magical I wanted to err more on the side of tedium with Goru.
Goru routines are just blocks that are called once for every tick of the reactor. It is up to the developer to implement behavior in terms of a state machine, where on each tick the routine takes some action and then updates the state of the routine for the next tick. This fulfills both design constraints:
1. Because routines are just blocks, they weigh in at about ~345 bytes of memory overhead.
2. Routine behavior is explicit because it is written as a state machine inside the block.
Couple more features worth noting:
* Goru includes channels for buffered reading/writing (similar to channels in Go).
* Goru ships with primitives for non-blocking IO to easily build things like http servers.
Curious your thoughts!
- Twitter (re)Releases Recommendation Algorithm on GitHub
-
Simple MapReduce that melt my brain (yes, fibers there)
For those who are interested here is the question.
- How does Ruby handle parallel HTTP requests in separate threads?
-
Two months into learning Ruby, it is the most beautiful language I ever learned
Welcome! Ruby isn't exactly "dying", but the hype/popularity is definitely fading. This is primarily because Ruby is no longer "new", most of Ruby's popularity came from Rails, and now Rails is no longer the "new hotness". However, Ruby still has lots of awesome features and lots of awesome other libraries and frameworks, such as the new fancy irb gem that uses reline, nokogiri, chunky_png, the async gems, Dragon Ruby, SciRuby, Ronin, and the new Hanami web framework.
-
ruby has supported native async or not?
In Github, there is a Async Gem(https://github.com/socketry/async).
- Efficient IO in Linux with io_uring [pdf]
Hanami
-
16 Best Ruby Frameworks For Web Development [2024]
With a clean architectural design and a primary object methodology, Hanami is counted among the best ruby frameworks that have gained popularity as an alternative to Rails. Hanami is “sorted” in design and provides small files that can be used independently to create a project stack. Hanami is lightweight and consumes fewer resources claiming 60% lesser memory than other big Ruby frameworks.
-
Is Ruby a dying language?
No, it's just no longer over-hyped. Ruby is settling into being a mature production language, similar to Python, Java, .NET, C++, etc. As you can see from the RedMonk 2023 data Ruby is very much still alive with tons of repositories on GitHub. Besides Shopify, GitHub is another big Ruby/Rails shop. Also, besides Rails, there are other new and upcoming projects like Hanami, DragonRuby, and Ronin.
-
Web Frameworks actively maintained in 2023?
Hanami 2 (hanamirb.org)
-
Enhancing development with REPLs - A practical guide
On all my application tutorials I start by setting up an application level REPL, it's basically a console script that loads all the files inside your project, if you're using a framework like Ruby on Rails or Hanami you already have a console by running the command console also.
-
Why are there so many Rails related posts here?
This is something that kind of annoys me; there's even a /r/rails sub-reddit specifically for Ruby on Rails stuff. Understandably Rails helped put Ruby on the map. Before Rails, Ruby was just another fringe language. Rails became massively popular, helped many startups quickly build their Web 2.0 sites, and become successful companies (ex: GitHub, LinkedIn, AirBnB, etc). Like others have said, "Rails is where the money is at". However, this posses a problem for the Ruby community: whenever Rails becomes less popular, so does Ruby. I wish the Ruby ecosystem wasn't so heavily centralized around Rails, and that we diversified our uses of Ruby a bit. There's of course Sinatra, dry-rb, Hanami, Dragon Ruby, SciRuby, and a dozen security tools written in Ruby such as Metasploit, BeFF, Arachni, and Ronin.
-
Two months into learning Ruby, it is the most beautiful language I ever learned
Welcome! Ruby isn't exactly "dying", but the hype/popularity is definitely fading. This is primarily because Ruby is no longer "new", most of Ruby's popularity came from Rails, and now Rails is no longer the "new hotness". However, Ruby still has lots of awesome features and lots of awesome other libraries and frameworks, such as the new fancy irb gem that uses reline, nokogiri, chunky_png, the async gems, Dragon Ruby, SciRuby, Ronin, and the new Hanami web framework.
-
OOP vs. services for organizing business logic: is there a third way?
Data Oriented Web Development with Ruby (upcoming book) by Peter Solnica, who is on the Hanami core team. Learning Hanami wouldn't be a bad idea either.
-
Understanding Clean Architecture with small Ruby libraries
After about 5 laps around Clean architecture since I came across hanami/hanami: The web, with simplicity., I'm finally getting it down in my gut, so I'll summarize.
-
Utilizando o padrão interactor no Ruby on Rails
View on GitHub
-
Writing a web application in pure Ruby (no framework)?
If it’s just an issue with Rails, then might I suggest looking at https://hanamirb.org - it’s a framework, but one built from the lessons learned from rails and all who followed.
What are some alternatives?
Concurrent Ruby - Modern concurrency tools including agents, futures, promises, thread pools, supervisors, and more. Inspired by Erlang, Clojure, Scala, Go, Java, JavaScript, and classic concurrency patterns.
Sinatra - Classy web-development dressed in a DSL (official / canonical repo)
EventMachine - EventMachine: fast, simple event-processing library for Ruby programs
Roda - Routing Tree Web Toolkit
Polyphony - Fine-grained concurrency for Ruby
Ruby on Rails - Ruby on Rails
Celluloid - Actor-based concurrent object framework for Ruby
Padrino - Padrino is a full-stack ruby framework built upon Sinatra.
Sequel - Sequel: The Database Toolkit for Ruby
Cuba - Rum based microframework for web development.
net-ssh - Pure Ruby implementation of an SSH (protocol 2) client
Volt - A Ruby web framework where your Ruby runs on both server and client