sketch VS awesome-ml

We've made a lot of data tooling things based on LLMs, and are in the process of rebranding and launching our main product.

1. sketch (in notebook, ai for pandas) https://github.com/approximatelabs/sketch

2. datadm (open source, "chat with data", with support for the open source LLMs (https://github.com/approximatelabs/datadm)

3. Our main product: julyp. https://julyp.com/ (currently under very active rebrand and cleanup) -- but a "chat with data" style app, with a lot of specialized features. I'm also streaming me using it (and sometimes building it) every weekday on twitch to solve misc data problems (https://www.twitch.tv/bluecoconut)

For your next question, about the stack and deploy:

This morning I added a "Related Projects" [3] Section to the Buckaroo docs. If Buckaroo doesn't solve your problem, look at one of the other linked projects (like Mito).

[1] https://github.com/approximatelabs/sketch

[2] https://github.com/paddymul/buckaroo

[3] https://buckaroo-data.readthedocs.io/en/latest/FAQ.html

For GPT/Copilot style help for pandas, in notebooks REPL flow (without needing to install plugins), I built sketch. I genuinely use it every-time I'm working on pandas dataframes for a quick one-off analysis. Just makes the iteration loop so much faster. (Specifically the `.sketch.howto`, anecdotally I actually don't use `.sketch.ask` anymore)

https://github.com/approximatelabs/sketch

https://github.com/approximatelabs/lambdaprompt It has served all of my personal use-cases since making it, including powering `sketch` (copilot for pandas) https://github.com/approximatelabs/sketch

Core things it does: Uses jinja templates, does sync and async, and most importantly treats LLM completion endpoints as "function calls", which you can compose and build structures around just with simple python. I also combined it with fastapi so you can just serve up any templates you want directly as rest endpoints. It also offers callback hooks so you can log & trace execution graphs.

All together its only ~600 lines of python.

I haven't had a chance to really push all the different examples out there, but most "complex behaviors", so there aren't many patterns to copy. But if you're comfortable in python, then I think it offers a pretty good interface.

I hope to get back to it sometime in the next week to introduce local-mode (eg. all the open source smaller models are now available, I want to make those first-class)

Please look at sketch and langchain pandas/SQL plugins. I have seen excellent results with both of these approaches. Both of these approaches will require you to send metadata to openAI.

👉 Understand your data through questions 👉 Create code from plain text Quick Read: https://www.marktechpost.com/2023/02/01/meet-sketch-an-ai-code-writing-assistant-for-pandas/ Github: https://github.com/approximatelabs/sketch

(3) Asking for re-writes of failed queries (happens occasionally) also helps

The main challenge I think with a lot of these "look it works" tools for data applications, is how do you get an interface that actually will be easy to adopt. The chat-bot style shown here (discord and slack integration) I can see being really valuable, as I believe there has been some traction with these style integrations with data catalog systems recently. People like to ask data questions to other people in slack, adding a bot that tries to answer might short-circuit a lot of this!

We built a prototype where we applied similar techniques to the pandas-code-writing part of the stack, trying to help keep data scientists / data analysts "in flow", integrating the code answers in notebooks (similar to how co-pilot puts suggestions in-line) -- and released https://github.com/approximatelabs/sketch a little while ago.

Python AI Helper https://github.com/approximatelabs/sketch

I do something like that for open source:

https://github.com/underlines/awesome-ml

But it lost a bit of traction lately.

It needs re-work for the categories, or better, a tagging system, because these products and libraries can sit in more than one space.

Plus it either needs massive collaboration, or some form of automation (with an LLM and indexer), as I can't keep up with it.

This aera is barely new. Look at how old some of the projects are:

https://github.com/underlines/awesome-ml/blob/master/audio-a...

The thing that changes is the complexity to run it. I was training my wife's voice and my voice for fun and needed 15min of audio and trained on my 3080 for 40 minutes.

Now it's 2 Minutes.

Thanks for your clarifications. I added it to my awesome list:

https://github.com/underlines/awesome-marketing-datascience/...

RAG is very difficult to do right. I am experimenting with various RAG projects from [1]. The main problems are:

- Chunking can interfer with context boundaries

- Content vectors can differ vastly from question vectors, for this you have to use hypothetical embeddings (they generate artificial questions and store them)

- Instead of saving just one embedding per text-chuck you should store various (text chunk, hypothetical embedding questions, meta data)

- RAG will miserably fail with requests like "summarize the whole document"

- to my knowledge, openAI embeddings aren't performing well, use a embedding that is optimized for question answering or information retrieval and supports multi language. Also look into instructor embeddings: https://github.com/embeddings-benchmark/mteb

1 https://github.com/underlines/awesome-marketing-datascience/...

I do the same and with currently with 700+ github stars people seem to like it, but it's still curated/manual, because the hf search API is so limited and I don't have the time to create a scraper.

Added to the list

I keep mine fairly up to date as well, almost daily: https://github.com/underlines/awesome-marketing-datascience/blob/master/README.md

Disclaimer: I am curating LLM-tools on github [1]

A few thoughts:

* allow for custom endpoint URLs, this way people can use open source LLMs with a fake openAI API backend like basaran[2] or llama-api-server[3]

* look into better embedding methods for info-retrieval like InstructorEmbeddings or Document Summary Index

* Don't use a single embedding per content item, use multiple to increase retrieval quality

1 https://github.com/underlines/awesome-marketing-datascience/...

2 https://github.com/hyperonym/basaran

3 https://github.com/iaalm/llama-api-server

Oobabooga isn't a wrapper for llama.cpp, but it can act as such. A usual Oobabooga installation on windows will use a GPTQ wheel (binary) compiled for cuda/windows, or alternatively use llama.cpp's API and act as a GUI. On Linux you had the choice to use the triton or cuda branch for GPTQ, but I don't know if that is still the case. You can also go the route to use virtualized and hardware accelerated WSL2 Ubuntu on Windows and use anything similar to linux. See my guide