skaffold VS kompose

A nice middle ground is using a tool like Google's Skaffold, which provides "Bazel-like" capabilities for composing Docker images and tagging them based on a number of strategies, including file manifests. In my case, I also use build args to explicitly set versions of external dependencies.

While I am in a Typescript environment with this setup at the moment, my personal experience that Skaffold with Docker has a lighter implementation and maintenance overhead than Bazel. (You also get the added benefit of easy deployment and automatic rebuilds.)

I quite liked using Bazel in a small Golang monorepo, but I ran into pain when trying to do things like include third-party pre-compiled binaries in the Docker builds, because of the unusual build rules convention. The advantage of Skaffold is it provides a thin build/tag/deploy/verify layer over Docker and other container types. Might be worth a look!

Kudos to the Google team building it! https://skaffold.dev

To get a similar experience of preevy up, first we’ll need to split the build and deploy using process or alternatively employ tools that orchestrate build-tag-push-update-sync flow like Skaffold/Tilt.

We will be using docker and microk8s from Canonical. For running our software during development, we will be using skaffold which is a great tool developed by Google.

To add more context, if you are developing containers in a local dev environment, the minimum you should have is the Google Cloud SDK and Skaffold. The SDK will allow you to programmatically interact with Googleapis e.g. auth, services, resources. Skaffold will allow you to build and deploy to the cloud similar to working with a local dev environment.

I have used both Skaffold and Devspace. I prefer the latter.

I wonder if it has some overlap with https://skaffold.dev/.

K3d and Skaffold for local development

skaffold.dev - build in k8s - no more asking for the database password. All the plumbing to the backend is just done so it's easier for them to test and demo any branch

Install Kompose - a conversion tool that allows you to convert your Docker Compose code to Kubernetes configuration files Run kompose convert in the same directory as your docker-compose.yml to generate the config files for your Kubernetes cluster

Kubernetes (via kompose)

As stated on their homepage, with Kompose, you can now push the same file to a production container orchestrator!. The tool definitely covers a wide range of Kubernetes features, among which these are meaningless locally but crucial for kubernetes :

K3s is a small, open source, no nonsense, distribution of Kubernetes. I think you'll find it just as easy to setup as Swarm. The challenge will be that Kubernetes has an entirely different API compared to Docker/Docker Compose. This can be mitigated by a tool called kompose, but using this will limit what you can do on Kubernetes.

Although I recently moved my own services from docker compose to kubernetes using https://kompose.io/ and now the only thing I run with docker compose, currently, is my private docker registry but everything including in kube, are always in their own folders.

I haven't run into the need to do that, but there is the Kompose project that exists to help with the conversion (https://kompose.io/)!

Compose claims to do that. https://kompose.io and https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/configure-pod-container/translate-compose-kubernetes/