skaffold VS telepresence

A nice middle ground is using a tool like Google's Skaffold, which provides "Bazel-like" capabilities for composing Docker images and tagging them based on a number of strategies, including file manifests. In my case, I also use build args to explicitly set versions of external dependencies.

While I am in a Typescript environment with this setup at the moment, my personal experience that Skaffold with Docker has a lighter implementation and maintenance overhead than Bazel. (You also get the added benefit of easy deployment and automatic rebuilds.)

I quite liked using Bazel in a small Golang monorepo, but I ran into pain when trying to do things like include third-party pre-compiled binaries in the Docker builds, because of the unusual build rules convention. The advantage of Skaffold is it provides a thin build/tag/deploy/verify layer over Docker and other container types. Might be worth a look!

Kudos to the Google team building it! https://skaffold.dev

To get a similar experience of preevy up, first we’ll need to split the build and deploy using process or alternatively employ tools that orchestrate build-tag-push-update-sync flow like Skaffold/Tilt.

We will be using docker and microk8s from Canonical. For running our software during development, we will be using skaffold which is a great tool developed by Google.

To add more context, if you are developing containers in a local dev environment, the minimum you should have is the Google Cloud SDK and Skaffold. The SDK will allow you to programmatically interact with Googleapis e.g. auth, services, resources. Skaffold will allow you to build and deploy to the cloud similar to working with a local dev environment.

I have used both Skaffold and Devspace. I prefer the latter.

I wonder if it has some overlap with https://skaffold.dev/.

K3d and Skaffold for local development

skaffold.dev - build in k8s - no more asking for the database password. All the plumbing to the backend is just done so it's easier for them to test and demo any branch

How does it compare to Telepresence?

https://github.com/telepresenceio/telepresence

Solutions are many, and could include Docker Compose, VS Code dev containers, Telepresence, Localstack or setting up temporary AWS accounts as a development environment for serverless applications.

I trialled Telepresence[0] for my company 2 or 3 years ago, that does this sort of thing very slickly. It didn't quite work for us back then, I forget why, but I imagine it's come along a way since then.

[0] https://www.telepresence.io

How does this compare to Telepresence?

seems to be very similar to https://www.telepresence.io

If they're web services you work on, you might try https://www.telepresence.io/ (Requires something to be installed in the cluster though, easily done).

Depending on the context, the type of code you do, you may want to also look into the sister protocol to LSP, DAP—debug adaptor protocol. It really depends on your context whether local dev, dev against a remote server, and if the latter whether you run under GCP and thus have the “Snapshot Debugger”, or under Kubernetes with something like Ambassadar/Emissary and thus can run Telepresence, whether you do local or remote Docker and thus most IDEs don't necessarily magically work especially if the containers are competently locked down, etc.

If you're on Kubernetes remotely, Telepresence [0] might be worth a look.

[0] https://www.telepresence.io

Sounds Like Telepresence (https://github.com/telepresenceio/telepresence) which intercepts traffic to a service on the cluster and directs it to your local environment.