simpatico
proposal-resizablearraybuffer
simpatico | proposal-resizablearraybuffer | |
---|---|---|
2 | 6 | |
7 | 157 | |
- | - | |
9.6 | 0.0 | |
23 days ago | 6 months ago | |
JavaScript | HTML | |
MIT License | - |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
simpatico
-
JavaScript import maps are now supported cross-browser
>Does this mean that in theory i could skip the build/bundling step entirely?
You can but you must write your app in something the browser understands (js not ts, css not sass etc) and use native modules. For example, here is the test harness for a custom module, written in pure html with no build step: https://github.com/javajosh/simpatico/blob/master/combine2.h.... Here is a more complex (and much older) example from Crockford: https://www.jslint.com/
And yes, the experience developing this way is quite nice!
-
Deno Joins TC39
*>...use types [at] runtime..."
Two things. First, TS conceives of itself as having no runtime component. If it did, I think people (including the TS devs) would be more confused.
Second, I'd say rather we need a runtime type system. In fact I've tried my hand at writing one in the most minimalist way possible, and have been working on it recently [1]. The type system is explicit in that a type is a JSON like object, similar to JSON schema, but 100x less code.
[1] https://github.com/javajosh/simpatico/blob/master/friendly.h... This is effectively the test harness for the module.
proposal-resizablearraybuffer
-
Goodbye, Node.js Buffer
Nit: "fixed-length" is no longer true as of very recently [1].
[1] https://github.com/tc39/proposal-resizablearraybuffer
-
Updates from the 98th TC39 meeting
Resizable ArrayBuffer: Resizable and growable ArrayBuffers.
-
What Is The Importance Of A Buffer Size in .alloc()?
Stage 3 Draft linked above https://tc39.es/proposal-resizablearraybuffer/. Implemented in Chrome and Chromium.
-
Deno Joins TC39
This is a great news! Good luck, Luca!
> Better support for explicit resource management
+1
Since everyone is making feature requests, I'd like to point out `ArrayBuffer.transfer`[1] -- ability to effectively move data without copying would do wonders for low-level/high-performance code in JS.
[1] https://github.com/tc39/proposal-resizablearraybuffer
-
Updates from 78th meeting of TC39
Resizable ArrayBuffers
What are some alternatives?
zod - TypeScript-first schema validation with static type inference
nodejs-polars - nodejs front-end of polars
proposal-do-expressions - Proposal for `do` expressions
proposal-source-phase-imports - Proposal to enable importing modules at the source phase
compression-dictionary-transport
proposal-import-assertions - Proposal for syntax to import ES modules with assertions [Moved to: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-import-attributes]
download-esm - Download ESM modules from npm and jsdelivr
proposal-class-static-block - ECMAScript class static initialization blocks
RegExp.escape - Proposal for investigating RegExp escaping for the ECMAScript standard
quickjspp
proposal-error-cause - TC39 proposal for accumulating errors