hush
hush
| hush | hush | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | |
| 8 | 627 | |
| - | 0.2% | |
| 10.0 | 2.9 | |
| about 4 years ago | 8 months ago | |
| C | Rust | |
| GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
hush
-
Guide: Hush Shell-Scripting Language
Wasn't Hush already the name of the HUmbleSHell ( Hush is a Bourne/POSIX-style shell that was originally part of BusyBox ) ...https://github.com/sheumann/hush
hush
-
Why should I care wether my shell is POSIX compliant?
If we're detaching from POSIX, why not get more wild? Why not xonsh or something? Also I found this lua inspired shell which could be cool: https://github.com/hush-shell/hush
-
Working with JSON in traditional and next-gen shells like Elvish, NGS, Nushell, Oil, PowerShell and even old-school Bash and Windows Command Prompt
Maybe hush (https://github.com/hush-shell/hush) should be included in this list.
- Hush – Unix shell based on the Lua programming language
- Hush - unix shell based on the Lua programming language
-
Guide: Hush Shell-Scripting Language
While being extremely small is a worthy goal, I suppose the aim of Hush is to make writing larger shell scripts easier and less error-prone. It's more for the niche of Perl of old than of minimal shells like ash.
For a very limited device, a very limited shell like that in Busybox is sufficient, because it likely does not need large shell scripts, or a lot of interactive work.
Looking at [1], current Hush is under 700k, which is still way smaller than Python or Perl, with much of its expressiveness.
[1]: https://github.com/hush-shell/hush/releases
-
Announcing Hush, a modern shell scripting language
Official guide: https://hush-shell.github.io/ Repository: https://github.com/hush-shell/hush
-
If you're not using a lexer generator for your compiler, why?
Yes, you can check the code here: https://github.com/gahag/hush
What are some alternatives?
lash - A modern, robust glue language
busybox - BusyBox mirror
busybox - The Swiss Army Knife of Embedded Linux - private tree
busybox - Docker Official Image packaging for Busybox
stshell
u-boot - "Das U-Boot" Source Tree
ngs - Next Generation Shell (NGS)
logos - Create ridiculously fast Lexers
Wormies-AU-Helpers - Helper scripts to make maintaining packages using AU even easier
parsegen - An LR parser generator, implemented as a proc macro