shellharden
shunit2
| shellharden | shunit2 | |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | 4 | |
| 4,556 | 1,549 | |
| - | - | |
| 5.0 | 3.5 | |
| about 1 month ago | 3 months ago | |
| Rust | Shell | |
| Mozilla Public License 2.0 | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
shellharden
-
Shellcheck finds bugs in your shell scripts
Everytime I see Shellcheck coming up, I have to mention shellharden[0] written by a colleague of mine. It is basically shellcheck but it applies the suggested changes automatically.
0: https://github.com/anordal/shellharden
-
similar to shellcheck?
Also worth mentioning shellharden
-
Bash Pitfalls
See also:
* https://www.shellcheck.net/ — linting tool to avoid common mistakes and improve your script
* Bash Practices: https://mywiki.wooledge.org/BashGuide/Practices
* Bash Pitfalls: https://mywiki.wooledge.org/BashPitfalls
* safe ways to do things in bash: https://github.com/anordal/shellharden/blob/master/how_to_do...
* better scripting: https://robertmuth.blogspot.in/2012/08/better-bash-scripting...
* robust scripting: https://www.davidpashley.com/articles/writing-robust-shell-s...
-
Code formatter, linters, etc. Recommendations?
There is shellcheck, and shellharden which is a strict version of it. There are similar stuff here, some that also help with your editor. You can also use a docker version of shfmt. See here for a quick tutorial on shfmt.
-
What is best Method of Submitting Bash Script, short Python ignorance confession (lament.)
Regarding linters, there are several of them in most languages.For bash, there is Shellcheck or a more strict (and sometimes confusing) Shellharden to do exactly what you want.
-
Awesome Rewrite It In Rust - A curated list of replacements for existing software written in Rust
For example, shellharden looks awesome.
- anordal/shellharden Safe ways to do things in bash
- How to do things safely in Bash
- How to do things safely in Bash (2018)
shunit2
-
Pure Bash Bible
> or something that would proper unit testing
<https://github.com/kward/shunit2>
-
First time writing bash scripts for work, not sure if this is true elsewhere
https://github.com/kward/shunit2 is your friend here.
-
AWK an old-school tool today
And in case you are thinking how powerful this is and like me trying to take it further to create small AWK powered "apps" to do the monotonous tasks while wondering how can you verify if what you are coding is valid, you can execute any number of unit tests for shell scripts, and therefore, AWK scripts using shunit2
-
ShellCheck: A static analysis tool for shell scripts
Alongside ShellCheck, I also use shUnit2 as my unit testing framework. Yes, you should test your bash.
https://github.com/kward/shunit2
What are some alternatives?
ShellCheck - ShellCheck, a static analysis tool for shell scripts
bats-core - Bash Automated Testing System
shfmt - Dockernized shfmt. This formats shell script.
shellspec - A full-featured BDD unit testing framework for bash, ksh, zsh, dash and all POSIX shells
shfmt - A shell formatter (sh/bash/mksh)
azure-policy - Repository for Azure Resource Policy built-in definitions and samples
sh - A shell parser, formatter, and interpreter with bash support; includes shfmt
etc - Things that are too small to keep in a separate repo, but too important not to version them.
rust_cmd_lib - Common rust command-line macros and utilities, to write shell-script like tasks in a clean, natural and rusty way
spdk - Storage Performance Development Kit