shellharden VS makesure

Everytime I see Shellcheck coming up, I have to mention shellharden[0] written by a colleague of mine. It is basically shellcheck but it applies the suggested changes automatically.

0: https://github.com/anordal/shellharden

Also worth mentioning shellharden

See also:

* https://www.shellcheck.net/ — linting tool to avoid common mistakes and improve your script

* Bash Practices: https://mywiki.wooledge.org/BashGuide/Practices

* Bash Pitfalls: https://mywiki.wooledge.org/BashPitfalls

* safe ways to do things in bash: https://github.com/anordal/shellharden/blob/master/how_to_do...

* better scripting: https://robertmuth.blogspot.in/2012/08/better-bash-scripting...

* robust scripting: https://www.davidpashley.com/articles/writing-robust-shell-s...

There is shellcheck, and shellharden which is a strict version of it. There are similar stuff here, some that also help with your editor. You can also use a docker version of shfmt. See here for a quick tutorial on shfmt.

Regarding linters, there are several of them in most languages.For bash, there is Shellcheck or a more strict (and sometimes confusing) Shellharden to do exactly what you want.

For example, shellharden looks awesome.

makesure, a similar tool (https://maximullaris.com/makesure-vs-just.html) I'm developing, doesn't require installation in the traditional sense: https://github.com/xonixx/makesure#installation.

Also, I was considering adding the same feature (generating the equivalent shell script) to my tool, but after doing some analysis decided not to pursue this idea for the following reasons: https://github.com/xonixx/makesure/issues/83#issuecomment-98....

Another simple tool similar to this is makesure[1]. It’s written in shell so the idea is you include makesure itself in your repo, which avoids needing to install another tool to run commands on your project.

It’s very simple so isn’t good for everything, but works well as a simple command runner.

[1] https://github.com/xonixx/makesure

- mawk (https://invisible-island.net/mawk/) - bundled in some Linux distros (?), known as the fastest byte-code compiled implementation.

All three have very good compatibility, but Gawk is super-set over POSIX standard. I have some evidence here, since I regularly test [1] against these implementations and even some others, like GoAWK.

[1] https://github.com/xonixx/makesure/actions/runs/1830978431

I've been using make to do this for ages, but its syntax really shows its age in a bad way. A while ago I switched to just (https://github.com/casey/just), which is a simple command runner with less unnecessary cruft (for my use case as a command runner) and a much saner syntax, and I've been pretty happy with it so far, I hardly ever need to look up anything.

There's also task (https://taskfile.dev/), which is YAML-based and might work well in an environment where everything else is YAML anyway, and makesure (https://github.com/xonixx/makesure), which is pretty similar to just, but didn't really click with me.

yes, there is also https://github.com/xonixx/makesure - It is a simple task/command runner inspired by make with declarative goals and dependencies.

Idempotence is achievable elegantly with makesure tool [1] using @reached_if directive [2]. Full disclosure - I’m the author of the tool.

[1] https://github.com/xonixx/makesure

[2] https://github.com/xonixx/makesure#reached_if