shell_gpt VS bass

https://github.com/TheR1D/shell_gpt?tab=readme-ov-file#shell...

I would like to stay in the terminal, and am using https://github.com/TheR1D/shell_gpt, my format is simply to send GPT a file to discuss:

ShellGPT https://github.com/TheR1D/shell_gpt does pretty well for a lot of use cases. I mostly use it in REPL mode, switching topics as needed. I have wrappers around the `sgpt` command to, say, start a REPL with a particular topic, say, Python, which loads my previous history on that topic as part of the prompt.

I also have an alias to save existing chats as text files so I can go back and review history.

Finally, there is an alias to load a question up in an editor if I need to enter multiline text, e.g. to discuss code fragments, etc.

I expect command-line workflows to be pretty individualized and I'm curious what others do. For me (old programmer), using a command line REPL feels much more natural (and blissfully noise-free) than going to a Web page to talk to, say, ChatGPT.

The API still works. I've been using https://github.com/TheR1D/shell_gpt/ in my workflow.

I recommend shell-gpt[1] for anyone with access to the OpenAI API. It works surprisingly well considering how simple it is. Be sure to browse the examples in the README.

[1] https://github.com/TheR1D/shell_gpt

Nice idea. You may want to mention in the docs that it requires https://github.com/TheR1D/shell_gpt ;)

I honestly bought the device just to play with the wearable version of my android app: a voice controlled ssh client that let me also pass voice input to shell_gpt. Other pre installed apps won't really work on this device, including google assistant, so I had to switch to google cloud speech to text APIs for speech recognition. I can still sideload compatible apps via bluetooth debugging tho

Maybe this can help : https://github.com/TheR1D/shell_gpt

I'm not really following these but they tend to get released every other day, like https://github.com/nlml/YoCLI/ and https://github.com/TheR1D/shell_gpt

> I do wish fish could seamlessly convert and run bash scripts on the fly..

It can. With a little help. I use this:

https://github.com/edc/bass

I've been using it for years and most things I need nowadays just work (i.e. have Fish support out of the box).

For all the rest, perhaps give https://github.com/edc/bass a try.

If you're running a script, you can use edc/bass to run it from a fish shell. Fisher is one of the first things I install after fish, then bass, z and a few other helper plugins.

https://github.com/edc/bass

https://github.com/jorgebucaran/fisher

Use bass to drop down to bash from fish :)

https://github.com/edc/bass

As for POSIX, I'll just type bash and do what I need to do, or call a script. You also might want to use the plugin bass, because some programs do not pick up on variables that are set in fish. I think there are other similar plugins, but in my experience bass is the best one. https://github.com/edc/bass

This is an older utility, but still a good one - Bass attempts to make the transition from Bash/Zsh to Fish a little simpler: https://github.com/edc/bass

omf install https://github.com/fabioantunes/fish-nvm omf install https://github.com/edc/bass

I think https://github.com/edc/bass might help?

There are a few ways to work with it, either it simply has "var=val" statements that you could turn into a while read loop that sets variables, or you would need something like bass.

There is no need to change `$SHELL` :-/ you can use Bass (https://github.com/edc/bass) to execute any bash script and it will apply the environment variables to the current fish environment.