shell-safe-rm VS thefuck

i ended up using shell-safe-rm plus trash-cli and my own wrapper script around rm that verifies some rules like for example the argument don't start with '/' , if i want to delete for example /home/shin/.local/somefile then the script will not let me and suggest to cd to /home/me/.local and delete from there , same if i do rm /var/somedir.

I use a script called `shell-safe-rm` [1], aliased as `rm` in interactive shells, such that I don't normally use `rm` directly. Instead of directly removing files, they are placed in the trash folder so they can be recovered if they were mistakenly deleted. Highly recommend using a script/program like this to help prevent accidental data loss.

[1] https://github.com/kaelzhang/shell-safe-rm

You could think about using trash-cli or safe-rm if you're too trigger happy with your terminal

So what's really is the difference/advantage compared to at least five other similar utilities already existing (trash-cli, shell-safe-rm, rm-trash, rmtrash, crap)? Can't really be that it uses D as the programming language. As a matter of fact why're there five utilities doing the same thing in the first place?

I meant I'm using safe-rm now but I was using another wrapper when I was younger for who knows why

Are you by chance interested in a command named after the four-letter word, which automatically fixes and reruns the last command: https://github.com/nvbn/thefuck

With a good terminal, you can work 2-4 times faster. This will save time and reduced your errors. You can also use fuck (just like how you swear most of the time) to correct errors easily.

Now I want a thefuck implementation via uncensored LLMs.

>spellcheck on commands

I prefer to just type "fuck":

https://github.com/nvbn/thefuck

I am starting to learn Rust and I am starting to implement the fuck CLI tool in Rust. Do you think this is a good use of my learning time?