shell-genie
clamshell
shell-genie | clamshell | |
---|---|---|
7 | 8 | |
463 | 58 | |
- | - | |
4.8 | 0.9 | |
2 months ago | about 1 year ago | |
Python | Python | |
MIT License | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
shell-genie
-
Show HN: Chatblade – ChatGPT as first class citizen in the CLI
Shell Genie is my favorite. It actually runs the commands if you want.
https://github.com/dylanjcastillo/shell-genie
-
shell-genie
shell-genie
- FLiP Stack Weekly 28 Jan 2023
- FLiP Stack Weekly 28-Jan-2023
- Show HN: Interact with the terminal in plain English using GPT-3
-
I made a CLI tool that lets you interact with the terminal in plain English using GPT-3
The code and installation instructions are available here: https://github.com/dylanjcastillo/shell-genie
clamshell
-
Shells Are Two Things
This is well made case - but I'm not sure I buy the central argument. Within some basic limits, I don't think terseness and readability have the contradiction made out here, because in programming we have abstraction, which gives us both.
To take the example command that's given:
beef.txt | grep "lasagna" | sort -n | uniq
Sure, writing the logic out for this in something like python straight out the bat with only the standard library might look messy, but with one basic convenience function it could quickly be:
search(for='lasagna', in='beef.txt', clear_duplicates=False).sorted()
Obviously you have to write the function in the first place, but I'd say if you're doing something like this often, it's easily worth spending that 2 minutes. And if you're not doing this often, you'll have a faster time writing more code, but keeping less heavy lifting of "how does bash pipe together" in your head.
I shared a project here a few weeks ago experimenting with what my dream shell might look like, what surprised me more than anything else, was how easy writing a repl environment actually is. I put a scrappy one together as one person in a few hours, so I don't understand why as developers we've reached general language models before being able to make a powerful, but new-user friendly shell.
Also, completely unrelated note, but posix only allows passing back strings - but isn't this true of web apis too which we use all the time? How come no json as a standard passback from programs?
Shameless plug for the project I mentioned earlier: https://github.com/benrutter/clamshell
-
This Week In Python
clamshell – experimenting with a python based shell
- FLiP Stack Weekly 28 Jan 2023
- FLiP Stack Weekly 28-Jan-2023
- Show HN: Clamshell- an experimental Python based shell
-
Clamshell- an experimental, interactive shell
Check it out here!
- Clamshell- an experimental, interactive daily shell
What are some alternatives?
hello - Desktop system for creators with a focus on simplicity, elegance, and usability. Based on FreeBSD. Less, but better!
logs-benchmark - Logs performance benchmark repo: Comparing Elastic, Loki and SigNoz
shite - The little hot-reloadin' static site maker from shell.
streamnative-rest-stocks
pulsar-mastodon-sink - Mastodon data streaming
xontrib-pipeliner - Let your pipe lines flow thru the Python code in xonsh.
kubric - A data generation pipeline for creating semi-realistic synthetic multi-object videos with rich annotations such as instance segmentation masks, depth maps, and optical flow.
sematic - An open-source ML pipeline development platform
FLiPN-Py-Stocks - finnhub stocks
python-functown - Helper library for Azure Function programming
carbonyl - Chromium running inside your terminal