sgcl VS completely-unscientific-benchmarks

The SGCL repository contains the source code for this benchmark that uses the tracked pointers: https://github.com/pebal/sgcl/blob/main/examples/treap/treap...

You can look at the SGCL garbage collector for C++: https://github.com/pebal/sgcl. It works in a separate thread, is locks-free and never stops the world.

It will never be called gc_ptr because C++ programmers have an allergy to the term GC. However, an attempt was made to implement a similar solution. Take a look at tracked_ptr: https://github.com/pebal/sgcl

SGCL is a real-time garbage collector for C++ without any pauses.

https://github.com/pebal/sgcl

Removed GC support was useless. You can have GC pointers in C++.

Mutators are threads that allocate memory and manipulate pointers, they can work completely independently of the GC. A mutator needs only to tag an object when copies or moves a pointer to this object. The GC detects this tag and marks the object as alive. Here is a working implementation for C++: https://github.com/pebal/sgcl

I don't know Rust but you can have a pauseless GC in C++. You just need to provide asynchronous access to root pointers.

Not true. Visit the repositorium and see the benchmark results: https://github.com/frol/completely-unscientific-benchmarks

Well we had some fun with https://github.com/frol/completely-unscientific-benchmarks. Although that's a while ago and it seems like the C versions have managed to pull ahead since then.